EMDV vs. EQLT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT).

EMDV and EQLT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2016. EQLT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index. It was launched on Sep 4, 2024. Both EMDV and EQLT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EMDV vs. EQLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EMDV vs. EQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	-1.51%	11.90%	2.49%
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF	5.57%	33.93%	-1.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDV achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than EQLT's 5.57% return.

EMDV

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: -1.51%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 8.67%
• 3Y*: 1.57%
• 5Y*: -2.81%
• 10Y*: 2.24%

EQLT

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -5.75%
• YTD: 5.57%
• 6M: 10.52%
• 1Y: 35.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDV vs. EQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EQLT's 0.35% expense ratio.

EMDV

ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF

EQLT

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF

Return for Risk

EMDV vs. EQLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDV

EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 37
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 39

EQLT

EQLT Risk / Return Rank: 85
EQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
EQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
EQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDV vs. EQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMDV	EQLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	1.75	-1.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	2.38	-1.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.34	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	2.99	-1.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.94	11.74	-7.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMDV vs. EQLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the EQLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDV and EQLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMDV	EQLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	1.75	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	1.26	-1.05

Correlation

The correlation between EMDV and EQLT is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EMDV vs. EQLT - Dividend Comparison

EMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than EQLT's 3.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	2.47%	2.46%	2.79%	1.88%	3.68%	2.12%	3.12%	2.38%	1.27%	2.09%	2.87%
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF	3.10%	3.10%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EMDV vs. EQLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDV drawdown since its inception was -39.20%, which is greater than EQLT's maximum drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDV and EQLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMDV	EQLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.20%	-17.38%	-21.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.48%	-12.00%	+4.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.05%	-7.80%	-9.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.53%	-3.79%	-9.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	3.06%	-0.80%

Volatility

EMDV vs. EQLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) is 4.86%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that EMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMDV	EQLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	9.95%	-5.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.30%	15.43%	-7.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.95%	20.22%	-8.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.40%	19.01%	-3.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.28%	19.01%	-0.73%