PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMDM vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMDM vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDM achieves a 27.95% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 11.45% return.


EMDM

1D
-2.74%
1M
-8.04%
6M
19.12%
YTD
27.95%
1Y
64.50%
3Y*
26.36%
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.42%
1M
3.09%
6M
8.08%
YTD
11.45%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
21.64%
5Y*
24.30%
10Y*
12.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDM vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
27.95%59.68%-4.93%14.75%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
11.45%9.04%35.41%16.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDM and YCS is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2023

-0.17

The correlation between EMDM and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to -0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMDM vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDM
EMDM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EMDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDM vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMDMYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

3.61

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.12

11.41

+3.71

EMDM vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDM Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDM and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMDM vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDM drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDM and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMDMYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-49.56%

+30.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-8.30%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-23.05%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.82%

0.00%

-10.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-19.80%

+15.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

2.62%

+1.66%

Volatility

EMDM vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.47%. This indicates that EMDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMDMYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

2.47%

+8.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.07%

11.85%

+13.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.21%

16.54%

+10.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

21.09%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

18.70%

+2.28%

EMDM vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMDM vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
2.96%3.57%5.87%2.16%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMDM and YCS have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMDM has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to YCS (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDM dropped -18.81% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 3-year performance, EMDM leads with 26.36% vs 21.64% for YCS. On fees, EMDM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EMDM has performed better with a 26.36% return vs 21.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMDM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

EMDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

EMDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMDM and 1.00% for YCS.

EMDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMDM and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer