EMDM vs. UEVM
EMDM (First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF) and UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMDM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while UEVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMDM returned 33.55%/yr vs 19.08%/yr for UEVM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMDM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for UEVM.
Performance
EMDM vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMDM achieves a 40.89% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 11.06% return.
EMDM
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 12.12%
- YTD
- 40.89%
- 6M
- 47.96%
- 1Y
- 93.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UEVM
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 28.17%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- —
EMDM vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 40.89% | 59.68% | -4.93% | 14.21% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 11.06% | 22.74% | 11.92% | 13.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMDM and UEVM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023 | 0.78 |
The correlation between EMDM and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMDM vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMDM
UEVM
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Technology
EMDM
UEVM
Financial Services
EMDM
UEVM
Basic Materials
EMDM
UEVM
Energy
EMDM
UEVM
Consumer Cyclical
EMDM
UEVM
Communication Services
EMDM
UEVM
Consumer Defensive
EMDM
UEVM
Industrials
EMDM
UEVM
Utilities
EMDM
UEVM
Healthcare
EMDM
UEVM
Real Estate
EMDM
-
UEVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMDM vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank
EMDM
UEVM
EMDM vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMDM | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.02 | 1.88 | +2.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.65 | 2.55 | +2.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.34 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.08 | 2.92 | +3.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.25 | 9.91 | +15.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMDM | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02 | 1.88 | +2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.34 | +1.27 |
Drawdowns
EMDM vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMDM drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDM and UEVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMDM | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.81% | -45.44% | +26.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.65% | -9.79% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | -18.88% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.33% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -11.68% | +7.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 2.88% | +0.89% |
Volatility
EMDM vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) at 4.80%. This indicates that EMDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMDM | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.47% | 4.80% | +4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.73% | 11.97% | +8.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.38% | 15.05% | +8.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 15.89% | +3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 18.38% | +1.40% |
EMDM vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMDM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMDM vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison
EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than UEVM's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 2.53% | 3.57% | 5.87% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 2.99% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMDM and UEVM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMDM has higher volatility (9.47%) compared to UEVM (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDM dropped -18.81% vs UEVM's -45.44%.
On 3-year performance, EMDM leads with 33.55% vs 19.08% for UEVM. On fees, UEVM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EMDM has performed better with a 33.55% return vs 19.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UEVM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMDM.
UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 2.53% for EMDM.
EMDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UEVM is Momentum. EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMDM and 0.45% for UEVM.
EMDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.02 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMDM and UEVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer