PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMDM vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMDM vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDM achieves a 28.39% return, which is significantly higher than TDIV's 16.55% return.


EMDM

1D
0.42%
1M
-3.12%
6M
12.42%
YTD
28.39%
1Y
66.69%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.54%

TDIV

1D
1.46%
1M
0.77%
6M
13.11%
YTD
16.55%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
26.19%
5Y*
16.16%
10Y*
16.98%
ALL TIME*
15.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$370.33K$752.09K$541.22K
$13.43M$13.15M$15.23M

EMDM vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
28.39%59.68%-4.93%14.75%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
16.55%25.27%24.43%29.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDM and TDIV is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2023

0.68

The correlation between EMDM and TDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMDM vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMDM
TDIV

Technology

39.9%
83.2%

Financial Services

25.6%

-

Basic Materials

12.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%

-

Energy

4.8%

-

Communication Services

4.0%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%

-

Industrials

2.6%
1.9%

Utilities

1.5%

-

Healthcare

0.5%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

EMDM
39.9%
TDIV
83.2%

Financial Services

EMDM
25.6%
TDIV

-

Basic Materials

EMDM
12.7%
TDIV

-

Consumer Cyclical

EMDM
5.3%
TDIV

-

Energy

EMDM
4.8%
TDIV

-

Communication Services

EMDM
4.0%
TDIV
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

EMDM
3.1%
TDIV

-

Industrials

EMDM
2.6%
TDIV
1.9%

Utilities

EMDM
1.5%
TDIV

-

Healthcare

EMDM
0.5%
TDIV

-

Real Estate

EMDM

-

TDIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMDM vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMDM
EMDM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EMDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMDM vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMDMTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.23

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

1.69

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.58

4.62

+8.96

EMDM vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDM Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDM and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMDM vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDM drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDM and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMDMTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-31.97%

+13.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-16.34%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-23.00%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.51%

-12.34%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-4.92%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

5.95%

-1.02%

Volatility

EMDM vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) at 5.85%. This indicates that EMDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMDMTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.92%

5.85%

+4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.36%

16.31%

+9.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.91%

20.69%

+7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.15%

21.12%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.15%

21.00%

+0.15%

EMDM vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMDM vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than TDIV's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
2.95%3.57%5.87%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.35%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMDM and TDIV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMDM has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to TDIV (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDM dropped -18.81% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 3-year performance, EMDM leads with 28.08% vs 26.19% for TDIV. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDIV has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EMDM has performed better with a 28.08% return vs 26.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMDM.

EMDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 1.35% for TDIV.

EMDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMDM and 0.50% for TDIV.

EMDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMDM and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer