EMDM vs. SPY
EMDM (First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMDM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMDM returned 33.55%/yr vs 22.64%/yr for SPY. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMDM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
EMDM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMDM achieves a 40.89% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 11.69% return.
EMDM
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 12.12%
- YTD
- 40.89%
- 6M
- 47.96%
- 1Y
- 93.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 29.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
EMDM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 40.89% | 59.68% | -4.93% | 14.21% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11.69% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 19.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMDM and SPY is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EMDM and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMDM vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMDM
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Technology
EMDM
SPY
Financial Services
EMDM
SPY
Basic Materials
EMDM
SPY
Energy
EMDM
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
EMDM
SPY
Communication Services
EMDM
SPY
Consumer Defensive
EMDM
SPY
Industrials
EMDM
SPY
Utilities
EMDM
SPY
Healthcare
EMDM
SPY
Real Estate
EMDM
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMDM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
EMDM
SPY
EMDM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMDM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.02 | 2.52 | +1.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.65 | 3.42 | +1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.46 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.08 | 3.42 | +2.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.25 | 15.93 | +9.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMDM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02 | 2.52 | +1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.59 | +1.02 |
Drawdowns
EMDM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMDM drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDM and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMDM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.81% | -55.19% | +36.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.65% | -8.88% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | -18.76% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -9.05% | +4.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 1.91% | +1.86% |
Volatility
EMDM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.75%. This indicates that EMDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMDM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.47% | 2.75% | +6.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.73% | 8.89% | +11.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.38% | 11.81% | +11.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 17.05% | +2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 17.94% | +1.84% |
EMDM vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMDM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMDM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than SPY's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 2.53% | 3.57% | 5.87% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMDM and SPY have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMDM has higher volatility (9.47%) compared to SPY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDM dropped -18.81% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 3-year performance, EMDM leads with 33.55% vs 22.64% for SPY. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EMDM has performed better with a 33.55% return vs 22.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMDM.
EMDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.97% for SPY.
EMDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SPY is S&P 500. EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMDM and 0.09% for SPY.
EMDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.02 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMDM and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer