EMDM vs. LRCU

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

EMDM (First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMDM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. EMDM is passively managed, while LRCU is actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMDM charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.

Performance

EMDM vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDM achieves a 40.57% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 314.98% return.

EMDM

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: 9.44%
• YTD: 40.57%
• 6M: 45.75%
• 1Y: 88.85%
• 3Y*: 31.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRCU

• 1D: 12.70%
• 1M: 77.20%
• YTD: 314.98%
• 6M: 346.56%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDM vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF	40.57%	24.12%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	314.98%	172.36%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDM and LRCU is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.66

Return for Risk

EMDM vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDM

EMDM Risk / Return Rank: 93
EMDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EMDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
EMDM Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EMDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
EMDM Martin Ratio Rank: 93

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDM vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMDM	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.71	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.71	—	—

Drawdowns

EMDM vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDM drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum LRCU drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDM and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMDM	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.81%	-40.09%	+21.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	0.00%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-9.29%	+5.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMDM	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.39%	114.38%	-88.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.42%	114.38%	-93.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.42%	114.38%	-93.96%

EMDM vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMDM vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF	2.54%	3.57%	5.87%	2.16%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMDM and LRCU in my portfolio?

EMDM and LRCU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMDM or LRCU?

On fees, EMDM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMDM or LRCU?

EMDM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMDM or LRCU?

EMDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

What is the main difference between EMDM and LRCU?

EMDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMDM and 1.30% for LRCU.