EMCS vs. STXE
EMCS (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMCS tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index while STXE tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMCS returned 22.52%/yr vs 23.32%/yr for STXE. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EMCS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.
Performance
EMCS vs. STXE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCS achieves a 24.35% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 31.48% return.
EMCS
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- YTD
- 24.35%
- 1Y
- 45.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.33%
STXE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- YTD
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 56.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $164.87K | $2.68M | $967.26K | |
| $412.67K | $566.81K | $571.67K |
EMCS vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF | 24.35% | 38.71% | 10.12% | -4.44% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 31.48% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 12.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCS and STXE is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023 | 0.85 |
The correlation between EMCS and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMCS vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMCS
STXE
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Technology
EMCS
STXE
Financial Services
EMCS
STXE
Consumer Cyclical
EMCS
STXE
Communication Services
EMCS
STXE
Basic Materials
EMCS
STXE
Real Estate
EMCS
STXE
Industrials
EMCS
STXE
Energy
EMCS
STXE
Consumer Defensive
EMCS
STXE
Healthcare
EMCS
STXE
Utilities
EMCS
STXE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMCS vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank
EMCS
STXE
EMCS vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMCS | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 2.73 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 10.29 | -1.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMCS vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCS drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCS and STXE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCS | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.86% | -20.38% | -24.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.25% | -20.38% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.73% | -20.38% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.17% | -14.59% | +4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.41% | -3.95% | -12.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 5.39% | -0.52% |
Volatility
EMCS vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) is 10.10%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that EMCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMCS | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.10% | 13.05% | -2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.90% | 28.09% | -3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.26% | 29.83% | -2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 20.17% | +1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.23% | 20.17% | +2.06% |
EMCS vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMCS vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison
EMCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than STXE's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF | 1.53% | 1.66% | 0.67% | 3.07% | 2.26% | 1.46% | 1.40% | 3.56% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.91% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, EMCS and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
STXE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to EMCS (10.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCS dropped -44.86% vs STXE's -20.38%.
On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 23.32% vs 22.52% for EMCS. On fees, EMCS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EMCS has been the lower-risk option at 10.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 23.32% return vs 22.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMCS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for STXE.
STXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.53% for EMCS.
EMCS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMCS and 0.32% for STXE.
STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMCS and STXE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer