PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMCS vs. STXE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMCS vs. STXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMCS achieves a 24.35% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 31.48% return.


EMCS

1D
0.81%
1M
-0.73%
6M
14.38%
YTD
24.35%
1Y
45.63%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.33%

STXE

1D
2.93%
1M
-5.07%
6M
18.30%
YTD
31.48%
1Y
56.34%
3Y*
23.32%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$164.87K$2.68M$967.26K
$412.67K$566.81K$571.67K

EMCS vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EMCS
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
24.35%38.71%10.12%-4.44%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
31.48%34.23%2.09%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EMCS and STXE is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023

0.85

The correlation between EMCS and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMCS vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMCS
STXE

Technology

51.4%
40.3%

Financial Services

27.3%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
1.4%

Communication Services

7.5%
3.2%

Basic Materials

2.3%
6.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.4%

Industrials

1.2%
5.0%

Energy

1.1%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
1.7%

Healthcare

0.0%
0.6%

Utilities

0.0%
1.1%

Technology

EMCS
51.4%
STXE
40.3%

Financial Services

EMCS
27.3%
STXE
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EMCS
7.5%
STXE
1.4%

Communication Services

EMCS
7.5%
STXE
3.2%

Basic Materials

EMCS
2.3%
STXE
6.2%

Real Estate

EMCS
1.8%
STXE
0.4%

Industrials

EMCS
1.2%
STXE
5.0%

Energy

EMCS
1.1%
STXE
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

EMCS
0.0%
STXE
1.7%

Healthcare

EMCS
0.0%
STXE
0.6%

Utilities

EMCS
0.0%
STXE
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMCS vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMCS
EMCS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EMCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

STXE
STXE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
STXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
STXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMCS vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMCSSTXEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.73

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

10.29

-1.15

EMCS vs. STXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the STXE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMCS and STXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMCS vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMCS drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCS and STXE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMCSSTXEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.86%

-20.38%

-24.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.25%

-20.38%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.73%

-20.38%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.17%

-14.59%

+4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.41%

-3.95%

-12.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.87%

5.39%

-0.52%

Volatility

EMCS vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) is 10.10%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that EMCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMCSSTXEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.10%

13.05%

-2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.90%

28.09%

-3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.26%

29.83%

-2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.68%

20.17%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.23%

20.17%

+2.06%

EMCS vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMCS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMCS vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison

EMCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than STXE's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EMCS
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
1.53%1.66%0.67%3.07%2.26%1.46%1.40%3.56%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
1.91%2.66%3.22%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, EMCS and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STXE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to EMCS (10.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCS dropped -44.86% vs STXE's -20.38%.

On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 23.32% vs 22.52% for EMCS. On fees, EMCS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EMCS has been the lower-risk option at 10.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 23.32% return vs 22.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMCS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for STXE.

STXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.53% for EMCS.

EMCS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMCS and 0.32% for STXE.

STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMCS and STXE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer