EMCR vs. STXE
EMCR (Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMCR tracks the Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net while STXE tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMCR returned 18.44%/yr vs 23.32%/yr for STXE. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EMCR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.
Performance
EMCR vs. STXE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCR achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 31.48% return.
EMCR
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 18.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.51%
STXE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- YTD
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 56.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $92.23K | $131.48K | $133.87K | |
| $412.67K | $566.81K | $571.67K |
EMCR vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 14.41% | 33.25% | 9.69% | 0.91% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 31.48% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 12.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCR and STXE is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between EMCR and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMCR vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMCR
STXE
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
EMCR
STXE
Financial Services
EMCR
STXE
Communication Services
EMCR
STXE
Consumer Cyclical
EMCR
STXE
Healthcare
EMCR
STXE
Industrials
EMCR
STXE
Basic Materials
EMCR
STXE
Consumer Defensive
EMCR
STXE
Real Estate
EMCR
STXE
Utilities
EMCR
STXE
Energy
EMCR
STXE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMCR vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank
EMCR
STXE
EMCR vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMCR | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 2.73 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | 10.29 | -3.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMCR vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCR drawdown since its inception was -34.28%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCR and STXE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCR | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.28% | -20.38% | -13.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.84% | -20.38% | +6.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.38% | -20.38% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.68% | -14.59% | +5.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -3.95% | -5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 5.39% | -0.93% |
Volatility
EMCR vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) is 8.48%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that EMCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMCR | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.48% | 13.05% | -4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.25% | 28.09% | -6.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.47% | 29.83% | -6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 20.17% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 20.17% | +0.10% |
EMCR vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMCR vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison
EMCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than STXE's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 1.53% | 2.43% | 6.62% | 1.95% | 3.05% | 1.83% | 1.75% | 3.15% | 0.19% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.91% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, EMCR and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
STXE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to EMCR (8.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCR dropped -34.28% vs STXE's -20.38%.
On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 23.32% vs 18.44% for EMCR. On fees, EMCR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EMCR has been the lower-risk option at 8.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 23.32% return vs 18.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMCR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for STXE.
STXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.53% for EMCR.
EMCR tracks Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMCR and 0.32% for STXE.
STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMCR and STXE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer