EMCR vs. RFEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM).
EMCR and RFEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMCR is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Dec 6, 2018. RFEM is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016.
Performance
EMCR vs. RFEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMCR vs. RFEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 1.10% | 33.25% | 9.69% | 10.55% | -18.73% | 5.54% | 13.49% | 22.41% | -1.76% |
RFEM First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF | 3.81% | 27.71% | 10.85% | 20.78% | -19.05% | 0.97% | 8.19% | 20.33% | -3.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCR achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than RFEM's 3.81% return.
EMCR
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- -9.79%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- 30.14%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- —
RFEM
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 28.91%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMCR vs. RFEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RFEM's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMCR vs. RFEM — Risk / Return Rank
EMCR
RFEM
EMCR vs. RFEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMCR | RFEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 1.60 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 2.23 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 2.41 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.39 | 9.67 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMCR | RFEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 1.60 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.36 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.44 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCR and RFEM is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMCR vs. RFEM - Dividend Comparison
EMCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than RFEM's 1.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 2.40% | 2.43% | 6.62% | 1.95% | 3.05% | 1.83% | 1.75% | 3.15% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFEM First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF | 1.97% | 1.98% | 3.64% | 3.28% | 7.74% | 3.21% | 1.22% | 3.75% | 2.37% | 1.62% | 3.73% |
Drawdowns
EMCR vs. RFEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCR drawdown since its inception was -34.28%, smaller than the maximum RFEM drawdown of -42.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCR and RFEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCR | RFEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.28% | -42.22% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.84% | -11.90% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.28% | -35.06% | +0.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.99% | -8.53% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.49% | -12.16% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 2.97% | +0.58% |
Volatility
EMCR vs. RFEM - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) has a higher volatility of 10.62% compared to First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) at 8.78%. This indicates that EMCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMCR | RFEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.62% | 8.78% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.85% | 12.83% | +2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.88% | 18.10% | +2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 17.58% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 19.76% | -0.08% |