PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMCIX vs. EDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMCIX vs. EDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund (EMCIX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMCIX achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly lower than EDD's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, EMCIX has underperformed EDD with an annualized return of 2.63%, while EDD has yielded a comparatively higher 5.71% annualized return.


EMCIX

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.52%
YTD
3.59%
6M
3.59%
1Y
8.43%
3Y*
8.62%
5Y*
-1.61%
10Y*
2.63%

EDD

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.64%
YTD
7.76%
6M
6.19%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
5.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMCIX vs. EDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund
3.59%8.81%8.28%6.01%-22.35%-6.47%7.34%11.08%-3.92%13.02%
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
7.76%32.46%8.64%14.09%-14.15%-7.03%-2.84%25.45%-14.09%16.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EMCIX and EDD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010

0.30

The correlation between EMCIX and EDD shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMCIX vs. EDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMCIX
EMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

EDD
EDD Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDD Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
EDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMCIX vs. EDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund (EMCIX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMCIXEDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.25

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

1.29

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.37

4.12

+7.25

EMCIX vs. EDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the EDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMCIX and EDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMCIX vs. EDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMCIX drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, smaller than the maximum EDD drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCIX and EDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMCIXEDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-59.38%

+23.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-17.67%

+14.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.02%

-17.67%

+13.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.13%

-32.04%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

-42.70%

+6.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.90%

-5.17%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-24.18%

+10.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

5.51%

-4.75%

Volatility

EMCIX vs. EDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund (EMCIX) is 0.96%, while Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that EMCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMCIXEDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

4.30%

-3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.96%

13.19%

-8.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.49%

16.37%

-10.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

15.41%

-9.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

17.66%

-11.60%

EMCIX vs. EDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMCIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EDD's 2.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMCIX vs. EDD - Dividend Comparison

EMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.33%, more than EDD's 8.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
8.96%9.76%11.45%7.30%6.82%6.93%6.92%8.15%9.90%8.18%10.32%12.65%
EMCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund
9.33%7.69%4.92%5.23%6.67%4.28%5.13%6.62%6.62%4.89%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMCIX and EDD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDD has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to EMCIX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCIX dropped -36.20% vs EDD's -59.38%.

EMCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMCIX and EDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer