PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMCIX vs. SEDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMCIX vs. SEDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund (EMCIX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMCIX achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than SEDAX's 3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EMCIX has underperformed SEDAX with an annualized return of 2.20%, while SEDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.92% annualized return.


EMCIX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.15%
6M
1.37%
YTD
2.88%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
-1.45%
10Y*
2.20%
ALL TIME*
0.00%

SEDAX

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.51%
6M
1.32%
YTD
3.95%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
9.56%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
3.92%
ALL TIME*
3.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EMCIX vs. SEDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund
2.88%8.81%8.28%6.01%-22.35%-6.47%7.34%11.08%-3.92%13.02%
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
3.95%20.33%3.13%12.86%-14.53%-4.93%4.68%15.55%-8.11%15.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EMCIX and SEDAX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between EMCIX and SEDAX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMCIX vs. SEDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMCIX
EMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
EMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SEDAX
SEDAX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SEDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SEDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMCIX vs. SEDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund (EMCIX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMCIXSEDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.47

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.39

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.39

9.45

-2.06

EMCIX vs. SEDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the SEDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMCIX and SEDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMCIX vs. SEDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMCIX drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, roughly equal to the maximum SEDAX drawdown of -37.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCIX and SEDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMCIXSEDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-37.03%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-5.49%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.02%

-8.17%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.82%

-26.86%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

-27.25%

-8.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.53%

-1.03%

-7.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.52%

-6.74%

-6.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

1.39%

-0.60%

Volatility

EMCIX vs. SEDAX - Volatility Comparison

Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund (EMCIX) has a higher volatility of 1.69% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX) at 1.18%. This indicates that EMCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMCIXSEDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

1.18%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

5.11%

-2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.63%

5.80%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.72%

7.05%

-1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.07%

8.38%

-2.31%

EMCIX vs. SEDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMCIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than SEDAX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMCIX vs. SEDAX - Dividend Comparison

EMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, more than SEDAX's 8.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund
9.59%7.69%4.92%5.23%6.67%4.28%5.13%6.62%6.62%4.89%0.00%0.00%
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
8.61%7.30%7.24%4.65%2.08%4.69%1.52%3.75%3.17%4.70%3.59%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMCIX and SEDAX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMCIX has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to SEDAX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCIX dropped -36.20% vs SEDAX's -37.03%.

SEDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMCIX and SEDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer