EMC vs. BOTZ
EMC (Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMC is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Global X, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. EMC is actively managed, while BOTZ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMC returned 15.69%/yr vs 9.83%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
EMC vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMC achieves a 20.87% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 1.13% return.
EMC
- 1D
- -5.16%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 20.87%
- 6M
- 22.02%
- 1Y
- 31.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 20.00%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- —
EMC vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF | 20.87% | 18.91% | 3.75% | 1.62% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 1.13% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMC and BOTZ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between EMC and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMC vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
EMC
BOTZ
EMC vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMC | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.15 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 1.04 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 3.34 | +4.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMC vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMC drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMC and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMC | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -55.54% | +37.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -19.34% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.38% | -29.02% | +10.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.16% | -11.99% | +6.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -18.27% | +14.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 6.01% | -2.10% |
Volatility
EMC vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) has a higher volatility of 11.79% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 10.19%. This indicates that EMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMC | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.79% | 10.19% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.86% | 20.13% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.90% | 25.54% | -2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 27.03% | -7.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 25.83% | -6.53% |
EMC vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMC vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
EMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, which matches BOTZ's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.65% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF | 0.65% | 0.78% | 1.13% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMC and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMC has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to BOTZ (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMC dropped -18.38% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 3-year performance, EMC leads with 15.69% vs 9.83% for BOTZ. On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 10.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EMC has performed better with a 15.69% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMC.
EMC and BOTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.65%.
EMC is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while BOTZ is Robotics. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMC and 0.68% for BOTZ.
EMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMC and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer