PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EMBE.L vs. IDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EMBE.L vs. IDV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EMBE.L (iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)) and IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMBE.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified Hedge TR EUR, while IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMBE.L returned 0.99%/yr vs 9.97%/yr for IDV. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMBE.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for IDV.

Performance

EMBE.L vs. IDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMBE.L is traded in EUR, while IDV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDV values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMBE.L achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than IDV's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, EMBE.L has underperformed IDV with an annualized return of 0.99%, while IDV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.97% annualized return.

EMBE.L

1D
0.24%
1M
0.81%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.21%
1Y
8.78%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
-0.33%
10Y*
0.99%

IDV

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.26%
YTD
13.70%
6M
15.52%
1Y
34.40%
3Y*
21.91%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
9.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMBE.L vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMBE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)		1.00%10.99%4.00%7.65%-20.85%-3.28%3.35%12.28%-8.41%8.13%
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF		13.70%34.10%10.86%7.01%-0.60%20.37%-13.69%26.35%-6.16%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EMBE.L and IDV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2013

0.27

EMBE.L vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EMBE.L
IDV

Basic Materials

-

5.8%

Communication Services

-

10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.2%

Energy

-

15.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

6.7%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

-

0.9%

Utilities

-

11.8%

Financial Services

-0.7%
30.1%

Basic Materials

EMBE.L

-

IDV
5.8%

Communication Services

EMBE.L

-

IDV
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EMBE.L

-

IDV
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

EMBE.L

-

IDV
7.2%

Energy

EMBE.L

-

IDV
15.6%

Healthcare

EMBE.L

-

IDV

-

Industrials

EMBE.L

-

IDV
6.7%

Real Estate

EMBE.L

-

IDV
2.4%

Technology

EMBE.L

-

IDV
0.9%

Utilities

EMBE.L

-

IDV
11.8%

Financial Services

EMBE.L
-0.7%
IDV
30.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)

iShares International Select Dividend ETF

Often compared with EMBE.L:
EMBE.L vs. EMBEMBE.L vs. CEMBEMBE.L vs. SEMB.LEMBE.L vs. XUHY.LEMBE.L vs. VWOBEMBE.L vs. PCYEMBE.L vs. JEPQ
Often compared with IDV:
IDV vs. SCHDIDV vs. LVHIIDV vs. VYMIIDV vs. IGROIDV vs. DIVOIDV vs. PIDIDV vs. DVY

Return for Risk

EMBE.L vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EMBE.L
EMBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EMBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
IDV
IDV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMBE.L vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EMBE.LIDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.49
3.19

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.41
4.21

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.60

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

5.23

-3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

21.70

-14.34

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMBE.L vs. IDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMBE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the IDV Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMBE.L and IDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EMBE.LIDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

3.19

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

1.02

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.60

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.30

-0.08

Drawdowns

EMBE.L vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMBE.L drawdown since its inception was -30.73%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -65.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMBE.L and IDV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EMBE.LIDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.73%

-65.73%

+35.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.58%

-6.61%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.93%

-12.78%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.47%

-18.92%

-11.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.73%

-42.12%

+11.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.92%

-2.65%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

-12.35%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.59%

-0.40%

Volatility

EMBE.L vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L) is 2.11%, while iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that EMBE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EMBE.LIDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

3.37%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.85%

9.04%

-4.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.89%

10.84%

-4.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.88%

12.77%

-3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.47%

16.57%

-7.10%

EMBE.L vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMBE.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMBE.L vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison

EMBE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than IDV's 4.45% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMBE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)		5.63%5.44%5.64%5.50%5.39%3.92%3.85%4.77%5.75%3.88%5.36%4.72%
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF		4.45%4.94%6.46%6.51%7.33%5.78%5.47%5.15%5.93%4.52%4.69%5.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

EMBE.L and IDV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMBE.L.

EMBE.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while IDV is Global Equities. EMBE.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified Hedge TR EUR, while IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EMBE.L and 0.49% for IDV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMBE.L and IDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer