PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EMBE.L vs. EMB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


EMBE.LEMB
YTD Return5.31%7.27%
1Y Return14.13%16.34%
3Y Return (Ann)-3.57%-1.10%
5Y Return (Ann)-1.63%0.53%
10Y Return (Ann)0.51%2.61%
Sharpe Ratio1.952.17
Sortino Ratio2.983.19
Omega Ratio1.361.39
Calmar Ratio0.620.86
Martin Ratio10.5212.32
Ulcer Index1.37%1.37%
Daily Std Dev7.40%7.75%
Max Drawdown-30.73%-34.70%
Current Drawdown-13.22%-6.04%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between EMBE.L and EMB is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

EMBE.L vs. EMB - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, EMBE.L achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly lower than EMB's 7.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EMBE.L has underperformed EMB with an annualized return of 0.51%, while EMB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.61% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.45%
5.85%
EMBE.L
EMB

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMBE.L vs. EMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMBE.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMB's 0.39% expense ratio.


EMBE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
Expense ratio chart for EMBE.L: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%
Expense ratio chart for EMB: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EMBE.L vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMBE.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EMBE.L, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.88
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EMBE.L, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EMBE.L, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EMBE.L, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EMBE.L, currently valued at 3.20, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.003.20
EMB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EMB, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.93
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EMB, currently valued at 2.79, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.79
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EMB, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EMB, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.83
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EMB, currently valued at 10.42, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0010.42

EMBE.L vs. EMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMBE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the EMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMBE.L and EMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.88
1.93
EMBE.L
EMB

Dividends

EMBE.L vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison

EMBE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than EMB's 4.90% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EMBE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.51%5.50%5.39%3.92%3.85%4.77%5.75%3.88%5.36%4.72%4.74%2.17%
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
4.90%4.74%5.04%3.90%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%4.56%4.75%

Drawdowns

EMBE.L vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMBE.L drawdown since its inception was -30.73%, smaller than the maximum EMB drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMBE.L and EMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-24.64%
-6.04%
EMBE.L
EMB

Volatility

EMBE.L vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMBE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) at 2.11%. This indicates that EMBE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.91%
2.11%
EMBE.L
EMB