PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMBD vs. EMCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMBD vs. EMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMBD achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than EMCB's 2.03% return.


EMBD

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.94%
YTD
1.27%
6M
2.05%
1Y
10.34%
3Y*
9.44%
5Y*
2.87%
10Y*

EMCB

1D
0.09%
1M
0.53%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.01%
1Y
7.19%
3Y*
7.97%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
4.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMBD vs. EMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMBD
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
1.27%12.55%6.76%10.60%-13.84%-1.84%11.53%
EMCB
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
2.03%8.19%7.11%8.76%-12.98%-0.62%10.08%

Correlation

The correlation between EMBD and EMCB is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.43

The correlation between EMBD and EMCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMBD vs. EMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMBD
EMCB

Financial Services

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

EMBD
0.8%
EMCB

-

Basic Materials

EMBD

-

EMCB

-

Communication Services

EMBD

-

EMCB

-

Consumer Cyclical

EMBD

-

EMCB

-

Consumer Defensive

EMBD

-

EMCB

-

Energy

EMBD

-

EMCB
100.0%

Healthcare

EMBD

-

EMCB

-

Industrials

EMBD

-

EMCB

-

Real Estate

EMBD

-

EMCB

-

Technology

EMBD

-

EMCB

-

Utilities

EMBD

-

EMCB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMBD vs. EMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMBD
EMBD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EMBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMBD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EMBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMBD Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

EMCB
EMCB Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMBD vs. EMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMBDEMCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.36

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.52

8.34

+1.17

EMBD vs. EMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the EMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMBD and EMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMBDEMCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.75

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.31

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.46

0.00

Drawdowns

EMBD vs. EMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMBD drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, which is greater than EMCB's maximum drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMBD and EMCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMBDEMCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.27%

-22.81%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.23%

-3.07%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.03%

-4.20%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.27%

-21.50%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.64%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-4.23%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

0.86%

+0.23%

Volatility

EMBD vs. EMCB - Volatility Comparison

Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) have volatilities of 1.62% and 1.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMBDEMCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

1.55%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

2.89%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.00%

4.16%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.17%

6.94%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.89%

8.48%

+0.41%

EMBD vs. EMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMBD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCB's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMBD vs. EMCB - Dividend Comparison

EMBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, more than EMCB's 5.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMBD
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.69%5.48%5.83%5.29%4.53%4.99%3.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMCB
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
5.35%5.47%5.29%5.09%4.04%3.43%3.85%4.17%4.20%4.04%4.08%5.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMBD and EMCB have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMBD has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to EMCB (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMBD dropped -24.27% vs EMCB's -22.81%.

On 5-year performance, EMBD leads with 2.87% vs 2.17% for EMCB. On fees, EMBD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMBD has performed better with a 2.87% return vs 2.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMBD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMCB.

EMBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.69%, compared with 5.35% for EMCB.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMBD and 0.60% for EMCB.

EMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMBD and EMCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer