EMBD vs. COPX
EMBD (Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMBD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. EMBD is actively managed, while COPX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMBD returned 2.87%/yr vs 19.87%/yr for COPX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMBD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
EMBD vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMBD achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 25.71% return.
EMBD
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 10.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
COPX
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 120.82%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.95%
EMBD vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBD Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.27% | 12.55% | 6.76% | 10.60% | -13.84% | -1.84% | 11.53% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.71% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 83.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMBD and COPX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.30 |
EMBD vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMBD
COPX
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
EMBD
COPX
-
Basic Materials
EMBD
-
COPX
Communication Services
EMBD
-
COPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMBD
-
COPX
-
Consumer Defensive
EMBD
-
COPX
-
Energy
EMBD
-
COPX
-
Healthcare
EMBD
-
COPX
-
Industrials
EMBD
-
COPX
Real Estate
EMBD
-
COPX
-
Technology
EMBD
-
COPX
-
Utilities
EMBD
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMBD vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
EMBD
COPX
EMBD vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMBD | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.42 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 4.37 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.52 | 14.00 | -4.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMBD | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.93 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.55 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.19 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
EMBD vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMBD drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMBD and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMBD | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.27% | -83.16% | +58.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.23% | -27.82% | +23.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.03% | -39.72% | +32.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.27% | -42.12% | +17.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -5.69% | +5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -39.30% | +33.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 8.66% | -7.57% |
Volatility
EMBD vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) is 1.62%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that EMBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMBD | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 15.38% | -13.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.16% | 35.68% | -31.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00% | 41.41% | -35.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.17% | 36.51% | -27.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.89% | 35.55% | -26.66% |
EMBD vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMBD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMBD vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
EMBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, more than COPX's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.13% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
EMBD Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.69% | 5.48% | 5.83% | 5.29% | 4.53% | 4.99% | 3.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMBD and COPX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to EMBD (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMBD dropped -24.27% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 5-year performance, COPX leads with 19.87% vs 2.87% for EMBD. On fees, EMBD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EMBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COPX has performed better with a 19.87% return vs 2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMBD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
EMBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.69%, compared with 2.13% for COPX.
EMBD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while COPX is Materials. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMBD and 0.65% for COPX.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMBD and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer