PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMB vs. SXRM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMB vs. SXRM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMB achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than SXRM.DE's -0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, EMB has outperformed SXRM.DE with an annualized return of 3.39%, while SXRM.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.67% annualized return.


EMB

1D
0.09%
1M
1.29%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.72%
1Y
11.53%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
3.39%

SXRM.DE

1D
0.38%
1M
0.09%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
0.05%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
2.95%
5Y*
-1.07%
10Y*
0.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMB vs. SXRM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
2.29%13.85%5.54%10.62%-18.63%-2.23%5.42%15.48%-5.47%10.28%
SXRM.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
-0.59%8.56%-0.51%3.57%-14.86%-3.03%9.73%9.02%0.39%2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EMB and SXRM.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2009

0.28

Over the past year, EMB and SXRM.DE have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMB vs. SXRM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMB
EMB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SXRM.DE
SXRM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SXRM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMB vs. SXRM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMBSXRM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.14

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

0.93

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

2.74

+7.54

EMB vs. SXRM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the SXRM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMB and SXRM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMB vs. SXRM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMB drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, which is greater than SXRM.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMB and SXRM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMBSXRM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-23.31%

-11.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-4.02%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-7.24%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.74%

-20.90%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

-23.31%

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.34%

+10.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-6.45%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.37%

-0.31%

Volatility

EMB vs. SXRM.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRM.DE) at 1.86%. This indicates that EMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXRM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMBSXRM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

1.86%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.66%

3.41%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.67%

4.60%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.76%

7.38%

+2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

6.30%

+3.66%

EMB vs. SXRM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRM.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMB vs. SXRM.DE - Dividend Comparison

EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, while SXRM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.03%4.98%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%
SXRM.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMB and SXRM.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRM.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRM.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMB.

EMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SXRM.DE is Government Bonds. EMB tracks JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index, while SXRM.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMB and 0.07% for SXRM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMB and SXRM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer