PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMB vs. JPMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMB vs. JPMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMB achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly higher than JPMB's 1.60% return.


EMB

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.29%
YTD
1.80%
6M
1.93%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
3.29%

JPMB

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.30%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.55%
1Y
11.48%
3Y*
7.93%
5Y*
1.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMB vs. JPMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
1.80%13.85%5.54%10.62%-18.63%-2.23%5.42%15.48%-4.87%
JPMB
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF
1.60%13.73%1.46%9.48%-16.05%-2.26%5.36%17.71%-4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between EMB and JPMB is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018

0.89

The correlation between EMB and JPMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMB vs. JPMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMB
EMB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

JPMB
JPMB Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JPMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPMB Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JPMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMB vs. JPMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMBJPMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.50

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

10.66

+0.35

EMB vs. JPMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the JPMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMB and JPMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMBJPMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.18

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.16

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.28

+0.16

Drawdowns

EMB vs. JPMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMB drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, which is greater than JPMB's maximum drawdown of -26.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMB and JPMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMBJPMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-26.33%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-4.61%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-7.53%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.74%

-26.16%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.38%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-7.06%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

1.08%

-0.03%

Volatility

EMB vs. JPMB - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB) have volatilities of 1.85% and 1.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMBJPMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

1.90%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.52%

4.37%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

5.29%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.75%

8.94%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

9.65%

+0.31%

EMB vs. JPMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMB and JPMB have an expense ratio of 0.39%.


Dividends

EMB vs. JPMB - Dividend Comparison

EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than JPMB's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.06%4.98%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%
JPMB
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF
5.80%6.71%6.32%5.99%4.94%4.29%4.29%4.51%4.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, EMB and JPMB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JPMB has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to EMB (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMB dropped -34.70% vs JPMB's -26.33%.

On 5-year performance, EMB leads with 1.86% vs 1.42% for JPMB. Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMB has performed better with a 1.86% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMB and JPMB have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.

JPMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.80%, compared with 5.06% for EMB.

EMB tracks JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index, while JPMB tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan.

JPMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMB and JPMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer