EMB vs. IVV
EMB (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMB returned 3.30%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for IVV. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
EMB vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMB achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, EMB has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 3.30%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.
EMB
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 10.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
IVV
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 23.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
EMB vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 2.18% | 13.85% | 5.54% | 10.62% | -18.63% | -2.23% | 5.42% | 15.48% | -5.47% | 10.28% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.20% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMB and IVV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2007 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, EMB and IVV have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMB vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
EMB
IVV
EMB vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMB | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.68 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.26 | 11.98 | -1.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMB vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMB drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMB and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMB | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -55.25% | +20.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.51% | -8.89% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.95% | -18.75% | +10.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.74% | -24.53% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | -33.90% | +5.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -3.14% | +2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -10.76% | +5.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 1.99% | -0.93% |
Volatility
EMB vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) is 1.78%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that EMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMB | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 4.88% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.68% | 9.85% | -5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.68% | 12.48% | -6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.76% | 16.98% | -7.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.96% | 18.07% | -8.11% |
EMB vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMB vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than IVV's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.04% | 4.98% | 5.46% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.89% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.11% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMB and IVV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to EMB (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMB dropped -34.70% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.58% vs 3.30% for EMB. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 3.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMB.
EMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 1.11% for IVV.
EMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while IVV is S&P 500. EMB tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMB and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMB and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer