EMB vs. EMHC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC).
EMB and EMHC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. EMHC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Emerging USD Bond Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Apr 6, 2021. Both EMB and EMHC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EMB vs. EMHC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMB vs. EMHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | -1.61% | 13.85% | 5.54% | 10.62% | -18.63% | 2.74% |
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | -1.69% | 14.07% | 3.52% | 10.06% | -17.75% | 1.68% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EMB having a -1.61% return and EMHC slightly lower at -1.69%.
EMB
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 9.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- 1.77%
- 10Y*
- 3.18%
EMHC
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 9.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMB vs. EMHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EMHC's 0.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMB vs. EMHC — Risk / Return Rank
EMB
EMHC
EMB vs. EMHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMB | EMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 2.01 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 2.18 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 8.84 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMB | EMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.15 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMB and EMHC is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMB vs. EMHC - Dividend Comparison
EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than EMHC's 6.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.09% | 4.98% | 5.46% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.89% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% |
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 6.33% | 6.16% | 5.95% | 5.12% | 5.11% | 2.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMB vs. EMHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMB drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, which is greater than EMHC's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMB and EMHC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMB | EMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -28.03% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.51% | -4.37% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -3.44% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -10.22% | +5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 1.08% | +0.02% |
Volatility
EMB vs. EMHC - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) at 2.75%. This indicates that EMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMB | EMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 2.75% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.01% | 3.85% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.95% | 6.76% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.75% | 9.05% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.94% | 9.05% | +0.89% |