PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EMB vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EMB vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMB (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMB returned 3.29%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for DBO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

EMB vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMB achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return. Over the past 10 years, EMB has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 3.29%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.

EMB

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.29%
YTD
1.80%
6M
1.93%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
3.29%

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMB vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF		1.80%13.85%5.54%10.62%-18.63%-2.23%5.42%15.48%-5.47%10.28%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund		84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EMB and DBO is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2007

0.15

The correlation between EMB and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.41 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF

Invesco DB Oil Fund

Often compared with EMB:
EMB vs. VWOBEMB vs. EMLCEMB vs. LEMBEMB vs. PCYEMB vs. EMHYEMB vs. EMBE.LEMB vs. BND
Often compared with DBO:
DBO vs. USODBO vs. USLDBO vs. OILKDBO vs. OIHDBO vs. xleDBO vs. TPLDBO vs. KSA

Return for Risk

EMB vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EMB
EMB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMB vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EMBDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.09
2.34

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.05
2.94

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

4.44

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

9.02

+1.99

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMB vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMB and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EMBDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.34

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.50

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.36

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.02

+0.41

Drawdowns

EMB vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMB drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMB and DBO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EMBDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-90.18%

+55.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-18.19%

+13.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-28.20%

+20.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.74%

-37.68%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

-61.69%

+32.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-51.38%

+51.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-62.25%

+57.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

8.92%

-7.87%

Volatility

EMB vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) is 1.85%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that EMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EMBDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

12.61%

-10.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.52%

28.20%

-23.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

34.46%

-28.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.75%

32.29%

-22.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

31.78%

-21.82%

EMB vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMB vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund		1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF		5.06%4.98%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

EMB and DBO have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to EMB (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMB dropped -34.70% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 11.37% vs 3.29% for EMB. On fees, EMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

EMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.

EMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while DBO is Oil & Gas. EMB tracks JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMB and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMB and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer