ELMD vs. WLFC
ELMD (Electromed, Inc.) and WLFC (Willis Lease Finance Corporation) are both stocks. ELMD operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while WLFC operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, ELMD returned 24.27%/yr vs 23.34%/yr for WLFC. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ELMD vs. WLFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELMD achieves a 27.54% return, which is significantly lower than WLFC's 40.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ELMD having a 24.27% annualized return and WLFC not far behind at 23.34%.
ELMD
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 27.54%
- 6M
- 24.42%
- 1Y
- 85.61%
- 3Y*
- 47.60%
- 5Y*
- 27.88%
- 10Y*
- 24.27%
WLFC
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -10.11%
- YTD
- 40.80%
- 6M
- 43.65%
- 1Y
- 31.69%
- 3Y*
- 66.56%
- 5Y*
- 33.79%
- 10Y*
- 23.34%
ELMD vs. WLFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELMD Electromed, Inc. | 27.54% | -1.46% | 170.85% | 4.00% | -19.31% | 32.52% | 13.41% | 69.94% | -16.14% | 56.44% |
WLFC Willis Lease Finance Corporation | 40.80% | -34.14% | 332.92% | -17.17% | 56.73% | 23.60% | -48.29% | 70.26% | 38.57% | -2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELMD and WLFC is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2010 | 0.10 |
The correlation between ELMD and WLFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ELMD:
$321.18M
WLFC:
$1.38B
ELMD:
$1.16
WLFC:
$17.02
ELMD:
31.92
WLFC:
11.18
ELMD:
0.88
WLFC:
0.00
ELMD:
4.50
WLFC:
1.78
ELMD:
6.53
WLFC:
1.99
ELMD:
$71.75M
WLFC:
$757.62M
ELMD:
$56.28M
WLFC:
$405.87M
ELMD:
$14.10M
WLFC:
$416.98M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELMD vs. WLFC — Risk / Return Rank
ELMD
WLFC
ELMD vs. WLFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) and Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ELMD | WLFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.15 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 1.00 | +2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.48 | 2.00 | +5.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ELMD vs. WLFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELMD drawdown since its inception was -78.65%, smaller than the maximum WLFC drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELMD and WLFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELMD | WLFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.65% | -88.12% | +9.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.27% | -31.84% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.86% | -49.88% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.86% | -49.88% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.84% | -79.76% | +23.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.47% | -20.21% | +14.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.86% | -42.35% | +8.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.49% | 15.87% | -4.38% |
Volatility
ELMD vs. WLFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) is 13.66%, while Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that ELMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WLFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELMD | WLFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.66% | 16.30% | -2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.53% | 36.76% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.64% | 46.92% | +5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.29% | 42.82% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.97% | 50.96% | +2.01% |
Dividends
ELMD vs. WLFC - Dividend Comparison
ELMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WLFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ELMD Electromed, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WLFC Willis Lease Finance Corporation | 0.76% | 0.85% | 0.72% |
Financials
ELMD vs. WLFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Electromed, Inc. and Willis Lease Finance Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ELMD vs. WLFC - Profitability Comparison
ELMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 18.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.
WLFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 194.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ELMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.77M and revenue of 18.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.
WLFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported an operating income of 33.79M and revenue of 194.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.
ELMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 18.58M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.
WLFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Willis Lease Finance Corporation reported a net income of 23.66M and revenue of 194.35M, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ELMD and WLFC have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WLFC has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to ELMD (13.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELMD dropped -78.65% vs WLFC's -88.12%.
ELMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELMD and WLFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer