ELM vs. WAMA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ELM (Elm Market Navigator ETF) and WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. ELM is actively managed, while WAMA is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ELM charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for WAMA.

Performance

ELM vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ELM

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 6.36%
• 6M: 5.89%
• 1Y: 16.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WAMA

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELM vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF	0.95%
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ELM and WAMA is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.76

Return for Risk

ELM vs. WAMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELM

ELM Risk / Return Rank: 57
ELM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
ELM Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ELM Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ELM Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
ELM Martin Ratio Rank: 58

WAMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELM vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ELM	WAMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.97	—	—

Drawdowns

ELM vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELM drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, which is greater than WAMA's maximum drawdown of -4.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELM and WAMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ELM	WAMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.02%	-4.37%	-4.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-3.48%	+1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-1.20%	-0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ELM	WAMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.11%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.75%	14.04%	-4.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.45%	14.04%	-3.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.45%	14.04%	-3.59%

ELM vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELM has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

ELM vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison

ELM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, while WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF	2.55%	2.71%
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ELM and WAMA in my portfolio?

ELM and WAMA have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ELM or WAMA?

On fees, ELM is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ELM or WAMA?

ELM is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for WAMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ELM or WAMA?

ELM has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.

What is the main difference between ELM and WAMA?

They also come from different issuers: Elm and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for ELM and 0.32% for WAMA.