ELIL vs. UCO
ELIL (Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - ELIL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while UCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). ELIL is actively managed, while UCO is passively managed. Over the past year, ELIL returned 63.78% vs 120.48% for UCO. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. ELIL charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.
Performance
ELIL vs. UCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELIL achieves a -8.59% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 149.12% return.
ELIL
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 23.31%
- YTD
- -8.59%
- 6M
- -1.88%
- 1Y
- 63.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UCO
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- 149.12%
- 6M
- 137.09%
- 1Y
- 120.48%
- 3Y*
- 25.90%
- 5Y*
- 22.16%
- 10Y*
- -11.31%
ELIL vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ELIL Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares | -8.59% | 36.32% |
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 149.12% | -26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELIL and UCO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELIL vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank
ELIL
UCO
ELIL vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares (ELIL) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ELIL | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.32 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 3.49 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.99 | 6.60 | -3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ELIL | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 2.12 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | -0.34 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
ELIL vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELIL drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELIL and UCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELIL | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.03% | -99.95% | +43.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.28% | -34.77% | -11.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -50.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -67.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.45% | -99.23% | +83.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -85.49% | +61.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.41% | 18.33% | +3.08% |
Volatility
ELIL vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares (ELIL) is 17.71%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 20.83%. This indicates that ELIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELIL | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.71% | 20.83% | -3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.09% | 46.44% | +6.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.36% | 57.11% | +18.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.27% | 59.78% | +23.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.27% | 71.36% | +11.91% |
ELIL vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ELIL has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ELIL vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison
ELIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.18%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ELIL Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares | 12.18% | 10.92% |
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ELIL and UCO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCO has higher volatility (20.83%) compared to ELIL (17.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELIL dropped -56.03% vs UCO's -99.95%.
On 1-year performance, UCO leads with 120.48% vs 63.78% for ELIL. On fees, UCO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, ELIL has been the lower-risk option at 17.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UCO has performed better with a 120.48% return vs 63.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UCO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ELIL.
ELIL has the higher dividend yield at 12.18%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.
ELIL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ELIL and 0.95% for UCO.
UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELIL and UCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer