ELIL vs. MUU

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ELIL (Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. ELIL is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. Over the past year, ELIL returned 76.70% vs 2796.55% for MUU. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ELIL charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

ELIL vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares (ELIL) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELIL achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 575.80% return.

ELIL

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 8.19%
• 6M: 7.46%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 1Y: 76.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: -9.01%
• 1M: -18.36%
• 6M: 372.65%
• YTD: 575.80%
• 1Y: 2,796.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELIL vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ELIL Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares	7.88%	36.32%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	575.80%	530.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ELIL and MUU is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025	0.15

Return for Risk

ELIL vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELIL

ELIL Risk / Return Rank: 38
ELIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
ELIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
ELIL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ELIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ELIL Martin Ratio Rank: 32

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELIL vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares (ELIL) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ELIL	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	23.95	-22.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	5.62	-3.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.69	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	66.09	-64.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.73	221.31	-217.58

ELIL vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 23.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELIL and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ELIL vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELIL drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELIL and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ELIL	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.03%	-75.07%	+19.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.28%	-52.72%	+6.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.80%	-36.32%	+28.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.84%	-23.43%	+0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.65%	16.57%	+4.08%

Volatility

ELIL vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares (ELIL) is 18.26%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.81%. This indicates that ELIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ELIL	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.26%	67.81%	-49.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.04%	116.35%	-62.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.77%	145.78%	-69.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.70%	138.10%	-56.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.70%	138.10%	-56.40%

ELIL vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELIL has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

ELIL vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

ELIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.45%, more than MUU's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ELIL Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X Shares	10.45%	10.92%	0.00%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.70%	4.27%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ELIL and MUU in my portfolio?

ELIL and MUU have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ELIL or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (67.81%) compared to ELIL (18.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELIL dropped -56.03% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, ELIL or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 2796.55% vs 76.70% for ELIL. On fees, ELIL is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, ELIL has been the lower-risk option at 18.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ELIL or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 2796.55% return vs 76.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ELIL or MUU?

ELIL is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ELIL or MUU?

ELIL has the higher dividend yield at 10.45%, compared with 0.70% for MUU.

What is the main difference between ELIL and MUU?

Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ELIL and 1.01% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (23.95 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.