PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELF vs. ADBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ELF vs. ADBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and Adobe Inc (ADBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELF achieves a -19.58% return, which is significantly higher than ADBE's -41.71% return.


ELF

1D
0.77%
1M
13.79%
YTD
-19.58%
6M
-19.92%
1Y
-52.43%
3Y*
-15.82%
5Y*
16.52%
10Y*

ADBE

1D
-6.76%
1M
-13.58%
YTD
-41.71%
6M
-42.76%
1Y
-50.68%
3Y*
-24.76%
5Y*
-17.73%
10Y*
7.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELF vs. ADBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
-19.58%-39.43%-13.02%161.01%66.52%31.84%56.17%86.26%-61.18%-22.91%
ADBE
Adobe Inc
-41.71%-21.29%-25.46%77.28%-40.65%13.38%51.64%45.78%29.10%70.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ELF and ADBE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

0.24

The correlation between ELF and ADBE shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ELF:

$3.67B

ADBE:

$82.02B

EPS

ELF:

$0.44

ADBE:

$17.42

PE Ratio

ELF:

137.90

ADBE:

11.71

PEG Ratio

ELF:

3.08

ADBE:

0.83

PS Ratio

ELF:

2.22

ADBE:

3.36

PB Ratio

ELF:

3.24

ADBE:

7.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

ELF:

$1.64B

ADBE:

$25.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ELF:

$1.16B

ADBE:

$22.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

ELF:

$185.47M

ADBE:

$9.68B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELF vs. ADBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELF
ELF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ELF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELF Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ELF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ADBE
ADBE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ADBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADBE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ADBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADBE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELF vs. ADBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and Adobe Inc (ADBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ELFADBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.73

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-1.03

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

-1.99

+0.67

ELF vs. ADBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELF Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is higher than the ADBE Sharpe Ratio of -1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELF and ADBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ELF vs. ADBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELF drawdown since its inception was -77.26%, roughly equal to the maximum ADBE drawdown of -79.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELF and ADBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELFADBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.26%

-79.89%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.20%

-49.21%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.26%

-67.86%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.26%

-70.36%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.95%

-70.36%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.42%

-25.99%

-6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.90%

27.31%

+12.59%

Volatility

ELF vs. ADBE - Volatility Comparison

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and Adobe Inc (ADBE) have volatilities of 16.53% and 16.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELFADBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.53%

16.64%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.43%

29.17%

+13.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.46%

35.08%

+31.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.30%

36.54%

+20.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.26%

34.48%

+20.78%

Dividends

ELF vs. ADBE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ELF nor ADBE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ELF vs. ADBE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. and Adobe Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
449.29M
6.62B
(ELF) Total Revenue
(ADBE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ELF vs. ADBE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. and Adobe Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
72.7%
89.2%
Portfolio components
ELF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.45M and revenue of 449.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.7%.

ADBE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported a gross profit of 5.90B and revenue of 6.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.2%.

ELF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.32M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.

ADBE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported an operating income of 2.24B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.8%.

ELF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of -49.37M and revenue of 449.29M, resulting in a net margin of -11.0%.

ADBE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ELF and ADBE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADBE has higher volatility (16.64%) compared to ELF (16.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELF dropped -77.26% vs ADBE's -79.89%.

ELF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.79 vs -1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELF and ADBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer