ELD vs. CBON
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON).
ELD and CBON are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ELD is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Aug 9, 2010. CBON is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2014.
Performance
ELD vs. CBON - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ELD vs. CBON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELD WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | -3.30% | 21.77% | -4.56% | 14.29% | -9.25% | -9.75% | 1.79% | 12.89% | -7.53% | 12.72% |
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF | 2.36% | 5.46% | 1.85% | 2.92% | -7.99% | 5.93% | 12.01% | 2.67% | 1.88% | 6.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELD achieves a -3.30% return, which is significantly lower than CBON's 2.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ELD having a 2.39% annualized return and CBON not far ahead at 2.45%.
ELD
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- -3.30%
- 6M
- -0.28%
- 1Y
- 10.08%
- 3Y*
- 6.57%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.39%
CBON
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 7.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ELD vs. CBON - Expense Ratio Comparison
ELD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CBON's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ELD vs. CBON — Risk / Return Rank
ELD
CBON
ELD vs. CBON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ELD | CBON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 1.93 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 2.79 | -1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 4.52 | -2.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 19.27 | -12.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ELD | CBON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.93 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.44 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.44 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.38 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between ELD and CBON is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ELD vs. CBON - Dividend Comparison
ELD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than CBON's 1.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELD WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund | 5.86% | 5.38% | 5.75% | 4.85% | 5.29% | 4.98% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 6.30% | 4.68% | 4.86% | 5.57% |
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF | 1.62% | 1.66% | 2.15% | 3.01% | 2.70% | 3.05% | 2.87% | 3.87% | 3.39% | 3.33% | 3.25% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
ELD vs. CBON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELD drawdown since its inception was -31.92%, which is greater than CBON's maximum drawdown of -14.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELD and CBON.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELD | CBON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.92% | -14.13% | -17.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -1.66% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.56% | -14.13% | -9.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.15% | -14.13% | -11.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | -0.14% | -6.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.43% | -4.05% | -9.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 0.39% | +1.31% |
Volatility
ELD vs. CBON - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) at 1.49%. This indicates that ELD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ELD | CBON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 1.49% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.92% | 2.51% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.66% | 3.92% | +5.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.83% | 4.96% | +5.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.27% | 5.60% | +5.67% |