EL vs. MKC
EL (The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.) and MKC (McCormick & Company, Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — EL in Household & Personal Products, MKC in Packaged Foods. Over the past 10 years, EL returned 0.04%/yr vs 2.06%/yr for MKC. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EL vs. MKC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EL having a -20.79% return and MKC slightly lower at -21.75%. Over the past 10 years, EL has underperformed MKC with an annualized return of 0.04%, while MKC has yielded a comparatively higher 2.06% annualized return.
EL
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- 6M
- -27.53%
- YTD
- -20.79%
- 1Y
- -2.86%
- 3Y*
- -21.44%
- 5Y*
- -22.93%
- 10Y*
- 0.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.19%
MKC
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 13.26%
- 6M
- -21.43%
- YTD
- -21.75%
- 1Y
- -23.61%
- 3Y*
- -13.71%
- 5Y*
- -7.10%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.93%
EL vs. MKC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EL The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | -20.79% | 42.13% | -47.59% | -40.13% | -32.31% | 40.03% | 29.77% | 60.34% | 3.38% | 68.68% |
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | -21.75% | -8.33% | 13.97% | -15.68% | -12.65% | 2.67% | 14.70% | 23.65% | 39.01% | 11.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between EL and MKC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 1995 | 0.28 |
The correlation between EL and MKC shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EL:
$29.79B
MKC:
$14.07B
EL:
-$0.68
MKC:
$6.05
EL:
2.02
MKC:
1.91
EL:
7.54
MKC:
2.01
EL:
$14.84B
MKC:
$7.39B
EL:
$11.09B
MKC:
$2.85B
EL:
$1.30B
MKC:
$1.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EL vs. MKC — Risk / Return Rank
EL
MKC
EL vs. MKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) and McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EL | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.88 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | -0.66 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | -1.26 | +1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EL vs. MKC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EL drawdown since its inception was -85.82%, which is greater than MKC's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL and MKC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EL | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.82% | -52.02% | -33.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.62% | -35.93% | -7.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.23% | -45.65% | -25.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.82% | -52.02% | -33.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.82% | -52.02% | -33.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.20% | -44.42% | -31.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.92% | -11.12% | -9.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.44% | 18.76% | +1.68% |
Volatility
EL vs. MKC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) is 7.75%, while McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) has a volatility of 11.85%. This indicates that EL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EL | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 11.85% | -4.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.05% | 25.45% | +13.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.49% | 29.68% | +16.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.53% | 24.88% | +18.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.69% | 24.44% | +12.25% |
Dividends
EL vs. MKC - Dividend Comparison
EL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than MKC's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EL The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | 1.70% | 1.34% | 3.11% | 1.81% | 0.99% | 0.59% | 0.56% | 0.86% | 1.21% | 1.10% | 1.62% | 1.16% |
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | 3.61% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 2.32% | 1.81% | 1.44% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.53% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 1.91% |
Financials
EL vs. MKC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EL vs. MKC - Profitability Comparison
EL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.84B and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.4%.
MKC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 778.20M and revenue of 1.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.
EL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. reported an operating income of 249.00M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
MKC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported an operating income of 276.40M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
EL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. reported a net income of 89.00M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
MKC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a net income of 160.20M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EL and MKC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MKC has higher volatility (11.85%) compared to EL (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EL dropped -85.82% vs MKC's -52.02%.
EL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EL and MKC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer