PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EL.PA vs. UL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EL.PA vs. UL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme (EL.PA) and The Unilever Group (UL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EL.PA is traded in EUR, while UL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EL.PA achieves a -30.71% return, which is significantly lower than UL's -6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, EL.PA has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 7.01%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.99% annualized return.


EL.PA

1D
2.21%
1M
7.19%
YTD
-30.71%
6M
-33.71%
1Y
-24.19%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
7.01%

UL

1D
1.11%
1M
4.76%
YTD
-6.94%
6M
-6.34%
1Y
-14.78%
3Y*
2.64%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
4.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EL.PA vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EL.PA
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme
-30.71%16.39%35.23%9.30%-8.12%47.94%-5.23%25.31%-2.60%8.42%
UL
The Unilever Group
-6.94%-6.61%28.88%-3.16%3.21%-0.70%0.05%15.43%2.25%22.92%

Correlation

The correlation between EL.PA and UL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.31

The correlation between EL.PA and UL shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EL.PA vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EL.PA
EL.PA Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
EL.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
EL.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EL.PA vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme (EL.PA) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EL.PAULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.89

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

-0.62

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.02

-1.25

+0.23

EL.PA vs. UL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is comparable to the UL Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL.PA and UL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EL.PA vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL.PA drawdown since its inception was -47.05%, roughly equal to the maximum UL drawdown of -48.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL.PA and UL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EL.PAULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.05%

-48.75%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.05%

-23.88%

-23.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.05%

-24.85%

-22.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.05%

-24.85%

-22.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.05%

-30.27%

-16.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.68%

-19.26%

-22.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-9.25%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.53%

11.91%

+11.62%

Volatility

EL.PA vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme (EL.PA) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to The Unilever Group (UL) at 6.50%. This indicates that EL.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EL.PAULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

6.50%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.89%

16.50%

+5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.20%

20.92%

+9.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.57%

19.85%

+5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.94%

21.25%

+3.69%

Dividends

EL.PA vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

EL.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than UL's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EL.PA
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme
2.19%1.46%1.68%1.82%1.48%0.59%0.90%1.50%1.39%1.30%1.03%0.89%
UL
The Unilever Group
3.87%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

EL.PA vs. UL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme and The Unilever Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EL.PA and UL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EL.PA and UL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer