EKJAX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
EKJAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 20, 1998. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
EKJAX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EKJAX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund | -13.16% | 16.28% | 36.91% | 33.14% | -33.88% | 13.07% | 39.03% | 45.22% | 1.13% | -0.53% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EKJAX having a -13.16% return and SWLGX slightly higher at -13.06%.
EKJAX
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -10.80%
- YTD
- -13.16%
- 6M
- -15.55%
- 1Y
- 12.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 14.16%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EKJAX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKJAX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EKJAX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
EKJAX
SWLGX
EKJAX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EKJAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 0.66 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 1.10 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.15 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 0.72 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 2.51 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EKJAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 0.66 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.56 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.68 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between EKJAX and SWLGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EKJAX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
EKJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.32%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund | 37.32% | 32.41% | 20.46% | 40.04% | 0.00% | 27.04% | 12.00% | 16.22% | 21.24% | 28.36% | 11.30% | 7.21% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EKJAX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKJAX drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKJAX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKJAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -32.69% | -27.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.10% | -16.16% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.43% | -32.69% | -17.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.10% | -16.16% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.68% | -7.13% | -13.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 4.62% | +0.79% |
Volatility
EKJAX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that EKJAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EKJAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 5.38% | +1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.71% | 11.82% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.62% | 22.31% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 21.47% | +6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.30% | 22.78% | +2.52% |