EKJAX vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
EKJAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 20, 1998. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
EKJAX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EKJAX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund | -9.45% | 16.28% | 36.91% | 33.14% | -33.88% | 13.07% | 39.03% | 45.22% | 1.13% | 34.03% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -8.97% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EKJAX achieves a -9.45% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's -8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, EKJAX has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 14.64%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.75% annualized return.
EKJAX
- 1D
- 4.28%
- 1M
- -6.78%
- YTD
- -9.45%
- 6M
- -11.94%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.64%
VONG
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- YTD
- -8.97%
- 6M
- -8.47%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EKJAX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKJAX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EKJAX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
EKJAX
VONG
EKJAX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EKJAX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.84 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 1.36 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.22 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.16 | 4.16 | -1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EKJAX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.84 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.59 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.81 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.84 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between EKJAX and VONG is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EKJAX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
EKJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.79%, more than VONG's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund | 35.79% | 32.41% | 20.46% | 40.04% | 0.00% | 27.04% | 12.00% | 16.22% | 21.24% | 28.36% | 11.30% | 7.21% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
EKJAX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKJAX drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKJAX and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKJAX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -32.72% | -26.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.10% | -16.23% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.43% | -32.72% | -17.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.43% | -32.72% | -17.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.60% | -12.29% | -2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.68% | -4.90% | -15.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 4.78% | +0.71% |
Volatility
EKJAX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.81%. This indicates that EKJAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EKJAX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 6.81% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.34% | 12.37% | +1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 22.42% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 21.35% | +6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 20.82% | +4.51% |