EKG vs. KNG
EKG (First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF) and KNG (FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EKG is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Lux Health Tech Index, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EKG returned -0.66%/yr vs 7.06%/yr for KNG. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EKG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
EKG vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EKG achieves a -10.11% return, which is significantly lower than KNG's 2.20% return.
EKG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- -10.11%
- 6M
- -12.99%
- 1Y
- -0.93%
- 3Y*
- -0.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
EKG vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKG First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF | -10.11% | 11.89% | 6.53% | -0.11% | -19.59% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 2.20% | 6.63% | 5.99% | 7.48% | -2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between EKG and KNG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022 | 0.57 |
The correlation between EKG and KNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EKG vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EKG
KNG
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
EKG
KNG
Technology
EKG
KNG
Basic Materials
EKG
-
KNG
Communication Services
EKG
-
KNG
-
Consumer Cyclical
EKG
-
KNG
Consumer Defensive
EKG
-
KNG
Energy
EKG
-
KNG
Financial Services
EKG
-
KNG
Industrials
EKG
-
KNG
Real Estate
EKG
-
KNG
Utilities
EKG
-
KNG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EKG vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
EKG
KNG
EKG vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EKG | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.13 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 0.87 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 2.25 | -2.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EKG | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 0.73 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.49 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
EKG vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKG drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKG and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKG | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.82% | -35.12% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.09% | -8.61% | -13.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.49% | -14.24% | -20.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.78% | -5.89% | -14.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.66% | -4.13% | -18.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.73% | 3.32% | +6.41% |
Volatility
EKG vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that EKG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EKG | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 2.29% | +4.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.42% | 7.39% | +9.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 10.19% | +11.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 13.59% | +13.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 17.18% | +9.89% |
EKG vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EKG vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
EKG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKG First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.67% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EKG and KNG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EKG has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKG dropped -43.82% vs KNG's -35.12%.
On 3-year performance, KNG leads with 7.06% vs -0.66% for EKG. On fees, EKG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, KNG has performed better with a 7.06% return vs -0.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EKG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.
KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.00% for EKG.
EKG is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while KNG is Dividend. EKG tracks NASDAQ Lux Health Tech Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EKG and 0.75% for KNG.
KNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EKG and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer