EKBAX vs. WRPIX
EKBAX (Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund) and WRPIX (Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund) are both mutual funds - EKBAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Allspring, while WRPIX is a Multistrategy fund managed by Allspring. Over the past 5 years, EKBAX returned 17.64%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for WRPIX. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EKBAX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for WRPIX.
Performance
EKBAX vs. WRPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EKBAX achieves a 31.44% return, which is significantly higher than WRPIX's 9.57% return.
EKBAX
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 20.53%
- YTD
- 31.44%
- 1Y
- 46.13%
- 3Y*
- 28.31%
- 5Y*
- 17.64%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.51%
WRPIX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 19.19%
- 3Y*
- 7.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
EKBAX vs. WRPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 31.44% | 21.87% | 21.75% | 22.23% | -13.47% | 19.61% | 12.66% | 21.98% |
WRPIX Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund | 9.57% | 5.37% | 11.23% | -0.06% | 10.44% | 6.84% | -16.77% | -2.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between EKBAX and WRPIX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, EKBAX and WRPIX have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EKBAX vs. WRPIX — Risk / Return Rank
EKBAX
WRPIX
EKBAX vs. WRPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) and Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund (WRPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EKBAX | WRPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.54 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 5.13 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.84 | 17.64 | +1.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EKBAX vs. WRPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKBAX drawdown since its inception was -55.64%, which is greater than WRPIX's maximum drawdown of -21.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKBAX and WRPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKBAX | WRPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.64% | -21.67% | -33.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -3.76% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.55% | -8.72% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.84% | -8.72% | -16.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.99% | -1.87% | -3.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -7.20% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 1.09% | +1.47% |
Volatility
EKBAX vs. WRPIX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund (WRPIX) at 2.27%. This indicates that EKBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EKBAX | WRPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 2.27% | +4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.74% | 5.27% | +11.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.06% | 6.98% | +13.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 7.17% | +11.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 7.08% | +10.86% |
EKBAX vs. WRPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKBAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than WRPIX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
EKBAX vs. WRPIX - Dividend Comparison
EKBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than WRPIX's 6.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 7.27% | 9.61% | 5.28% | 6.16% | 12.50% | 6.89% | 2.03% | 9.49% | 7.14% | 6.20% | 10.05% | 11.47% |
WRPIX Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund | 6.54% | 7.16% | 3.25% | 4.66% | 15.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EKBAX and WRPIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EKBAX has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to WRPIX (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKBAX dropped -55.64% vs WRPIX's -21.67%.
WRPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EKBAX and WRPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer