PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EKBAX vs. MHELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EKBAX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKBAX achieves a 36.56% return, which is significantly higher than MHELX's 17.65% return. Over the past 10 years, EKBAX has outperformed MHELX with an annualized return of 16.54%, while MHELX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.94% annualized return.


EKBAX

1D
3.04%
1M
13.03%
YTD
36.56%
6M
36.64%
1Y
65.31%
3Y*
32.33%
5Y*
19.50%
10Y*
16.54%

MHELX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.75%
YTD
17.65%
6M
20.19%
1Y
39.35%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EKBAX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EKBAX
Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund
36.56%21.87%21.75%22.23%-13.47%19.61%12.66%32.99%-5.55%14.43%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
17.65%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-12.76%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EKBAX and MHELX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between EKBAX and MHELX has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EKBAX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EKBAX
EKBAX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EKBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EKBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EKBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EKBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EKBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EKBAX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EKBAXMHELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.39

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.28

4.64

+4.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

39.09

15.69

+23.40

EKBAX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EKBAX Sharpe Ratio is 4.13, which is higher than the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKBAX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EKBAXMHELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13

2.06

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

0.24

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.43

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.33

+0.19

Drawdowns

EKBAX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKBAX drawdown since its inception was -55.64%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKBAX and MHELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EKBAXMHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.64%

-61.24%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.32%

-8.52%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.55%

-30.81%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.84%

-32.01%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.33%

-39.02%

+6.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-12.93%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

2.51%

-0.77%

Volatility

EKBAX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) at 4.53%. This indicates that EKBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EKBAXMHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

4.53%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

15.24%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.45%

19.23%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

21.00%

-2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

20.97%

-3.39%

EKBAX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKBAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EKBAX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

EKBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than MHELX's 6.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EKBAX
Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund
7.05%9.61%5.28%6.16%12.50%6.89%2.03%9.49%7.14%6.20%10.05%11.47%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.13%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


EKBAX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EKBAX has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to MHELX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKBAX dropped -55.64% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

EKBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EKBAX and MHELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer