EJAN vs. POCT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EJAN (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both exchange-traded funds - EJAN is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while POCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EJAN returned 3.11%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for POCT. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EJAN charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for POCT.

Performance

EJAN vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EJAN achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's 5.33% return.

EJAN

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 6.81%
• 6M: 7.51%
• 1Y: 16.24%
• 3Y*: 8.61%
• 5Y*: 3.11%
• 10Y*: —

POCT

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 6M: 5.92%
• 1Y: 14.36%
• 3Y*: 12.17%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EJAN vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	6.81%	14.78%	2.69%	5.37%	-8.01%	-1.53%	10.46%
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	5.33%	11.00%	9.54%	20.12%	-1.26%	9.46%	9.83%

Correlation

The correlation between EJAN and POCT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020	0.56

The correlation between EJAN and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

EJAN vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EJAN	POCT
Technology	37.0%	36.2%
Financial Services	19.4%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	10.1%
Industrials	7.5%	8.1%
Communication Services	6.9%	10.9%
Basic Materials	6.5%	1.8%
Energy	4.0%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	4.9%
Healthcare	2.9%	8.4%
Utilities	2.1%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.9%

Return for Risk

EJAN vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJAN

EJAN Risk / Return Rank: 63
EJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
EJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 63

POCT

POCT Risk / Return Rank: 75
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJAN vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EJAN	POCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.35	-0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	3.38	-0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.47	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	3.28	-0.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.66	16.84	-5.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EJAN vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EJAN and POCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EJAN	POCT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	2.35	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	1.24	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.87	-0.52

Drawdowns

EJAN vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJAN drawdown since its inception was -22.23%, which is greater than POCT's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJAN and POCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EJAN	POCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.23%	-18.80%	-3.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.63%	-4.40%	-2.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.75%	-10.22%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.00%	-10.22%	-11.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.20%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.79%	-1.50%	-4.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.42%	0.86%	+0.56%

Volatility

EJAN vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 0.94%. This indicates that EJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EJAN	POCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.10%	0.94%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.28%	4.77%	+2.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.91%	6.17%	+1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.11%	7.94%	+3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.69%	10.22%	+2.47%

EJAN vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EJAN has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than POCT's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

EJAN vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither EJAN nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EJAN and POCT in my portfolio?

EJAN and POCT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EJAN or POCT?

EJAN has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to POCT (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EJAN dropped -22.23% vs POCT's -18.80%.

Which ETF is better, EJAN or POCT?

On 5-year performance, POCT leads with 9.82% vs 3.11% for EJAN. On fees, POCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EJAN or POCT?

Over the 5-year period, POCT has performed better with a 9.82% return vs 3.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EJAN or POCT?

POCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EJAN or POCT?

EJAN and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EJAN and POCT?

EJAN is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while POCT is Defined Outcome. EJAN tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EJAN and 0.79% for POCT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

POCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.