PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EJAN vs. BAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EJAN vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EJAN vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EJAN
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January
0.41%14.78%2.69%5.37%-8.01%-1.53%10.46%
BAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
2.08%8.28%15.95%23.16%-7.04%12.58%5.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EJAN achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 2.08% return.


EJAN

1D
2.54%
1M
-3.91%
YTD
0.41%
6M
2.17%
1Y
12.21%
3Y*
6.37%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*

BAPR

1D
2.58%
1M
0.99%
YTD
2.08%
6M
4.42%
1Y
15.33%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EJAN vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EJAN has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EJAN vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJAN
EJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
EJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJAN vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EJANBAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.29

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

1.99

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.74

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.79

11.59

-3.80

EJAN vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EJAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EJAN and BAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EJANBAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.29

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.88

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.75

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between EJAN and BAPR is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EJAN vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither EJAN nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EJAN vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJAN drawdown since its inception was -22.23%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJAN and BAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EJANBAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.23%

-23.91%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.51%

-9.19%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-15.58%

-6.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.26%

0.00%

-4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-2.66%

-3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.38%

+0.18%

Volatility

EJAN vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) at 3.45%. This indicates that EJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EJANBAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

3.45%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.45%

4.26%

+2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

11.90%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.05%

11.54%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.78%

13.25%

-0.47%