EIXIX vs. MBXIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EIXIX (Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund) and MBXIX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - EIXIX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds, while MBXIX is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 5 years, EIXIX returned -4.26%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for MBXIX. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. EIXIX charges 1.50%/yr vs 2.04%/yr for MBXIX.

Performance

EIXIX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund (EIXIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIXIX achieves a -5.56% return, which is significantly lower than MBXIX's 15.26% return.

EIXIX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.65%
• YTD: -5.56%
• 6M: -5.40%
• 1Y: -12.87%
• 3Y*: -5.02%
• 5Y*: -4.26%
• 10Y*: —

MBXIX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 15.26%
• 6M: 14.24%
• 1Y: 20.71%
• 3Y*: 12.14%
• 5Y*: 7.61%
• 10Y*: 8.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIXIX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EIXIX Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund	-5.56%	-8.86%	0.88%	-2.09%	-6.82%	4.55%	6.18%	15.84%
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I	15.26%	4.35%	13.49%	-0.67%	7.72%	16.89%	-0.45%	14.71%

Correlation

The correlation between EIXIX and MBXIX is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2019	-0.11

The correlation between EIXIX and MBXIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (3 years) to -0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EIXIX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIXIX

EIXIX Risk / Return Rank: 0
EIXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
EIXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
EIXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
EIXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
EIXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

MBXIX

MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 93
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIXIX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund (EIXIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EIXIX	MBXIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.90	2.94	-4.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.49	4.32	-6.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.71	1.57	-0.86
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	5.30	-6.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.71	20.51	-22.22

EIXIX vs. MBXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIXIX Sharpe Ratio is -1.90, which is lower than the MBXIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIXIX and MBXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EIXIX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIXIX drawdown since its inception was -21.39%, smaller than the maximum MBXIX drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIXIX and MBXIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIXIX	MBXIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.39%	-31.73%	+10.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.76%	-3.85%	-9.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.70%	-15.59%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.39%	-15.59%	-5.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.14%	0.00%	-21.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.49%	-3.97%	-1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.46%	0.99%	+6.47%

Volatility

EIXIX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund (EIXIX) has a higher volatility of 1.84% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 1.55%. This indicates that EIXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIXIX	MBXIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.84%	1.55%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.86%	5.19%	-0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.77%	6.94%	-0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.40%	11.49%	-7.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.70%	13.42%	-8.72%

EIXIX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIXIX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIXIX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison

EIXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EIXIX Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund	5.12%	7.24%	9.31%	8.57%	6.68%	7.11%	5.65%	4.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I	0.00%	0.00%	2.63%	2.25%	7.74%	0.00%	4.27%	5.18%	3.33%	3.33%	1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIXIX and MBXIX in my portfolio?

EIXIX and MBXIX have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EIXIX or MBXIX?

EIXIX has higher volatility (1.84%) compared to MBXIX (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIXIX dropped -21.39% vs MBXIX's -31.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs -1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.