EIXIX vs. MLXIX
EIXIX (Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund) and MLXIX (Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - EIXIX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds, while MLXIX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 5 years, EIXIX returned -5.13%/yr vs 20.29%/yr for MLXIX. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIXIX charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for MLXIX.
Performance
EIXIX vs. MLXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIXIX achieves a -9.53% return, which is significantly lower than MLXIX's 32.37% return.
EIXIX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- 6M
- -9.13%
- YTD
- -9.53%
- 1Y
- -15.80%
- 3Y*
- -6.26%
- 5Y*
- -5.13%
- 10Y*
- —
MLXIX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 33.19%
- YTD
- 32.37%
- 1Y
- 17.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 20.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
EIXIX vs. MLXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIXIX Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund | -9.53% | -8.86% | 0.88% | -2.09% | -6.82% | 4.55% | 6.18% | 15.84% |
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 32.37% | -8.56% | 45.26% | 15.34% | 27.02% | 42.04% | -20.02% | -0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIXIX and MLXIX is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2019 | 0.00 |
The correlation between EIXIX and MLXIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIXIX vs. MLXIX — Risk / Return Rank
EIXIX
MLXIX
EIXIX vs. MLXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund (EIXIX) and Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIXIX | MLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.65 | 1.18 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | 1.37 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.21 | 2.60 | -4.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIXIX vs. MLXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIXIX drawdown since its inception was -24.46%, smaller than the maximum MLXIX drawdown of -76.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIXIX and MLXIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIXIX | MLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.46% | -76.78% | +52.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.22% | -15.44% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.95% | -22.14% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.46% | -22.14% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.46% | -5.12% | -19.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.60% | -23.05% | +17.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 8.11% | -0.72% |
Volatility
EIXIX vs. MLXIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund (EIXIX) is 3.37%, while Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that EIXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIXIX | MLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 7.29% | -3.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.75% | 16.83% | -11.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.33% | 20.44% | -13.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.62% | 22.52% | -17.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 28.08% | -23.25% |
EIXIX vs. MLXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIXIX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MLXIX's 1.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIXIX vs. MLXIX - Dividend Comparison
EIXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than MLXIX's 6.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIXIX Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund | 4.18% | 7.24% | 9.31% | 8.57% | 6.68% | 7.11% | 5.65% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.77% | 8.26% | 5.02% | 6.67% | 7.15% | 8.26% | 14.52% | 15.93% | 15.62% | 11.37% | 8.76% | 11.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIXIX and MLXIX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLXIX has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to EIXIX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIXIX dropped -24.46% vs MLXIX's -76.78%.
MLXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIXIX and MLXIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer