PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIT-UN.TO vs. STEW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIT-UN.TO vs. STEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) and SRH Total Return Fund Inc. (STEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EIT-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while STEW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the STEW values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIT-UN.TO achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than STEW's 5.73% return.


EIT-UN.TO

1D
-0.45%
1M
2.60%
6M
11.61%
YTD
17.08%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
17.59%
10Y*
15.77%
ALL TIME*
8.43%

STEW

1D
0.15%
1M
1.63%
6M
11.04%
YTD
5.73%
1Y
10.98%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$2.29MCA$2.39MCA$2.65M
CA$2.08MCA$2.08MCA$2.01M

EIT-UN.TO vs. STEW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund
17.08%11.81%27.99%5.94%1.06%
STEW
SRH Total Return Fund Inc.
5.73%14.79%30.06%10.84%-2.78%

Correlation

The correlation between EIT-UN.TO and STEW is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2022

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIT-UN.TO vs. STEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EIT-UN.TO
EIT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EIT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

STEW
STEW Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
STEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
STEW Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
STEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
STEW Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EIT-UN.TO vs. STEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) and SRH Total Return Fund Inc. (STEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIT-UN.TOSTEWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.16

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

1.11

+3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.99

3.18

+14.81

EIT-UN.TO vs. STEW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the STEW Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIT-UN.TO and STEW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIT-UN.TO vs. STEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -63.38%, which is greater than STEW's maximum drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIT-UN.TO and STEW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIT-UN.TOSTEWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.38%

-19.12%

-44.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.93%

-9.72%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.45%

-11.07%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-1.07%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-3.67%

-4.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

3.39%

-2.03%

Volatility

EIT-UN.TO vs. STEW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) is 2.14%, while SRH Total Return Fund Inc. (STEW) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that EIT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIT-UN.TOSTEWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

4.03%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.15%

8.98%

-1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.86%

12.03%

-3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.07%

16.07%

-4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.47%

16.07%

+1.40%

EIT-UN.TO vs. STEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIT-UN.TO has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than STEW's 2.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIT-UN.TO vs. STEW - Dividend Comparison

EIT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.80%, more than STEW's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund
6.80%7.64%7.90%9.29%8.97%9.08%12.20%11.53%11.65%10.16%10.06%10.71%
STEW
SRH Total Return Fund Inc.
4.13%3.56%3.43%3.60%2.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIT-UN.TO and STEW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIT-UN.TO and STEW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer