EISIX vs. UMBMX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

EISIX (Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund) and UMBMX (Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - EISIX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Carillon Family of Funds, while UMBMX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Carillon Family of Funds. Over the past 10 years, EISIX returned 12.13%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for UMBMX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EISIX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UMBMX.

Performance

EISIX vs. UMBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund (EISIX) and Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EISIX achieves a 18.06% return, which is significantly higher than UMBMX's 13.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EISIX having a 12.13% annualized return and UMBMX not far ahead at 12.56%.

EISIX

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: -2.35%
• 6M: 13.31%
• YTD: 18.06%
• 1Y: 39.09%
• 3Y*: 25.15%
• 5Y*: 15.52%
• 10Y*: 12.13%

UMBMX

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -0.86%
• 6M: 8.03%
• YTD: 13.50%
• 1Y: 21.11%
• 3Y*: 18.48%
• 5Y*: 9.39%
• 10Y*: 12.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EISIX vs. UMBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EISIX Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund	18.06%	39.31%	14.86%	20.02%	-11.83%	17.84%	2.92%	18.66%	-17.86%	27.57%
UMBMX Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund	13.50%	15.46%	22.93%	12.73%	-17.31%	15.69%	27.28%	20.76%	-9.83%	24.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EISIX and UMBMX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.74

The correlation between EISIX and UMBMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EISIX vs. UMBMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EISIX

EISIX Risk / Return Rank: 82
EISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
EISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

UMBMX

UMBMX Risk / Return Rank: 49
UMBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
UMBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
UMBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
UMBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
UMBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EISIX vs. UMBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund (EISIX) and Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EISIX	UMBMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	1.44	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.10	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.25	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	2.38	+0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.79	9.14	+2.65

EISIX vs. UMBMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EISIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the UMBMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EISIX and UMBMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EISIX vs. UMBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EISIX drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, smaller than the maximum UMBMX drawdown of -49.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EISIX and UMBMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EISIX	UMBMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.30%	-49.91%	+10.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.54%	-9.19%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.38%	-19.41%	+6.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.05%	-26.30%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.30%	-36.91%	-2.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.64%	-2.92%	-2.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-7.07%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.33%	2.38%	+0.95%

Volatility

EISIX vs. UMBMX - Volatility Comparison

Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund (EISIX) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) at 4.79%. This indicates that EISIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EISIX	UMBMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.82%	4.79%	+3.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.17%	12.04%	+4.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.04%	15.16%	+2.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	17.81%	-1.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.48%	19.09%	-2.61%

EISIX vs. UMBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EISIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBMX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EISIX vs. UMBMX - Dividend Comparison

EISIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than UMBMX's 9.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EISIX Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund	2.54%	3.00%	3.83%	2.95%	0.87%	1.81%	1.09%	2.39%	1.81%	1.36%	2.31%	0.77%
UMBMX Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund	9.07%	10.29%	15.75%	0.17%	4.21%	11.54%	2.40%	0.74%	8.09%	8.38%	2.39%	8.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EISIX and UMBMX in my portfolio?

EISIX and UMBMX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EISIX or UMBMX?

EISIX has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to UMBMX (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EISIX dropped -39.30% vs UMBMX's -49.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.