PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EISIX vs. CWSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EISIX vs. CWSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund (EISIX) and Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EISIX achieves a 19.76% return, which is significantly lower than CWSGX's 22.74% return.


EISIX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.00%
6M
11.14%
YTD
19.76%
1Y
42.32%
3Y*
25.67%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
12.25%
ALL TIME*
9.37%

CWSGX

1D
-0.59%
1M
-5.75%
6M
15.58%
YTD
22.74%
1Y
41.79%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EISIX vs. CWSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EISIX
Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund
19.76%39.31%14.86%20.02%-11.83%17.84%2.92%18.66%-17.86%11.91%
CWSGX
Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund
22.74%14.77%35.94%22.41%-30.85%15.83%42.56%27.38%-8.37%11.08%

Correlation

The correlation between EISIX and CWSGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017

0.69

The correlation between EISIX and CWSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EISIX vs. CWSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EISIX
EISIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

CWSGX
CWSGX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CWSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CWSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EISIX vs. CWSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund (EISIX) and Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EISIXCWSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.27

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

3.14

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

10.78

+1.03

EISIX vs. CWSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EISIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the CWSGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EISIX and CWSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EISIX vs. CWSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EISIX drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, which is greater than CWSGX's maximum drawdown of -37.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EISIX and CWSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EISIXCWSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.30%

-37.29%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.54%

-12.67%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-27.80%

+14.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.05%

-37.29%

+10.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.28%

-10.00%

+5.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-11.08%

+3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

3.69%

-0.14%

Volatility

EISIX vs. CWSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund (EISIX) is 6.31%, while Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund (CWSGX) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that EISIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EISIXCWSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

7.91%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.66%

20.55%

-3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

25.35%

-6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

24.55%

-7.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

24.27%

-7.74%

EISIX vs. CWSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EISIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than CWSGX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EISIX vs. CWSGX - Dividend Comparison

EISIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than CWSGX's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWSGX
Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund
0.71%0.87%6.44%0.00%4.78%21.74%6.70%0.03%0.45%0.02%0.00%0.00%
EISIX
Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund
2.50%3.00%3.83%2.95%0.87%1.81%1.09%2.39%1.81%1.36%2.31%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


EISIX and CWSGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWSGX has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to EISIX (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EISIX dropped -39.30% vs CWSGX's -37.29%.

EISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EISIX and CWSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer