EIS vs. XLI
EIS (iShares MSCI Israel ETF) and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EIS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net), while XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIS returned 12.35%/yr vs 14.15%/yr for XLI. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EIS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLI.
Performance
EIS vs. XLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIS achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly higher than XLI's 13.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EIS has underperformed XLI with an annualized return of 12.35%, while XLI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.15% annualized return.
EIS
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 6M
- 18.71%
- 1Y
- 56.95%
- 3Y*
- 33.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.01%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
XLI
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
EIS vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 18.11% | 45.11% | 34.50% | 5.48% | -27.05% | 22.83% | 12.01% | 20.93% | -4.84% | 12.77% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.90% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIS and XLI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2008 | 0.60 |
The correlation between EIS and XLI shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EIS vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EIS
XLI
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
EIS
XLI
-
Technology
EIS
XLI
Industrials
EIS
XLI
Healthcare
EIS
XLI
-
Real Estate
EIS
XLI
-
Utilities
EIS
XLI
Communication Services
EIS
XLI
-
Consumer Cyclical
EIS
XLI
Consumer Defensive
EIS
XLI
-
Energy
EIS
XLI
-
Basic Materials
EIS
XLI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIS vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank
EIS
XLI
EIS vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIS | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.26 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.62 | 1.98 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.86 | 7.82 | +8.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIS vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIS drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, smaller than the maximum XLI drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIS and XLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIS | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.94% | -62.26% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.40% | -12.21% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.10% | -18.49% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.88% | -21.64% | -20.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.88% | -42.33% | +0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | -1.24% | -4.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.89% | -9.20% | -4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 3.09% | +0.52% |
Volatility
EIS vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) has a higher volatility of 9.80% compared to Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) at 6.22%. This indicates that EIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIS | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.80% | 6.22% | +3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.62% | 13.59% | +4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.81% | 16.17% | +7.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 17.55% | +4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 20.04% | +1.17% |
EIS vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIS vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison
EIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than XLI's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.38% | 1.39% | 1.66% | 1.04% | 0.16% | 2.06% | 0.87% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.55% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIS and XLI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EIS has higher volatility (9.80%) compared to XLI (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIS dropped -51.94% vs XLI's -62.26%.
On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 14.15% vs 12.35% for EIS. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLI has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EIS.
EIS has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 1.16% for XLI.
EIS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XLI is Industrials Equities. EIS tracks MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net), while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EIS and 0.08% for XLI.
EIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIS and XLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer