PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIRL vs. NORW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIRL vs. NORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIRL achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 26.31% return. Over the past 10 years, EIRL has underperformed NORW with an annualized return of 8.09%, while NORW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.61% annualized return.


EIRL

1D
-0.80%
1M
5.57%
YTD
3.82%
6M
5.87%
1Y
19.14%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
8.09%

NORW

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
26.31%
6M
31.64%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIRL vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIRL
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
3.82%28.82%-1.64%35.13%-18.83%13.72%9.63%28.15%-21.92%29.82%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
26.31%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EIRL and NORW is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2010

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between EIRL and NORW has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EIRL vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIRL
NORW

Financial Services

34.0%
22.6%

Industrials

24.8%
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

14.6%
12.5%

Healthcare

10.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
0.2%

Energy

4.8%
29.4%

Real Estate

2.1%
0.4%

Basic Materials

0.5%
10.9%

Technology

0.3%
4.1%

Communication Services

-

5.9%

Utilities

-

0.7%

Financial Services

EIRL
34.0%
NORW
22.6%

Industrials

EIRL
24.8%
NORW
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

EIRL
14.6%
NORW
12.5%

Healthcare

EIRL
10.2%
NORW

-

Consumer Cyclical

EIRL
8.8%
NORW
0.2%

Energy

EIRL
4.8%
NORW
29.4%

Real Estate

EIRL
2.1%
NORW
0.4%

Basic Materials

EIRL
0.5%
NORW
10.9%

Technology

EIRL
0.3%
NORW
4.1%

Communication Services

EIRL

-

NORW
5.9%

Utilities

EIRL

-

NORW
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIRL vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIRL
EIRL Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
EIRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIRL Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
EIRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIRL Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIRL vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIRLNORWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.37

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

3.95

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

11.27

-6.85

EIRL vs. NORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIRL Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the NORW Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIRL and NORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIRLNORWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

2.18

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.37

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.46

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.40

+0.03

Drawdowns

EIRL vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIRL drawdown since its inception was -46.48%, which is greater than NORW's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRL and NORW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIRLNORWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.48%

-35.62%

-10.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.28%

-9.18%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.04%

-16.06%

-6.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.14%

-32.78%

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.48%

-33.86%

-12.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-3.53%

+2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-10.13%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

3.21%

+1.14%

Volatility

EIRL vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) at 4.06%. This indicates that EIRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIRLNORWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

4.06%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

12.73%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

16.70%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

21.88%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

20.80%

+0.96%

EIRL vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIRL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIRL vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison

EIRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than NORW's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIRL
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
2.61%2.71%2.56%1.00%1.13%0.82%0.50%2.11%1.52%1.44%1.34%1.70%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
2.72%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIRL and NORW have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIRL has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to NORW (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRL dropped -46.48% vs NORW's -35.62%.

On 10-year performance, NORW leads with 9.61% vs 8.09% for EIRL. On fees, EIRL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NORW has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EIRL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NORW.

NORW has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.61% for EIRL.

EIRL tracks MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EIRL and 0.50% for NORW.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIRL and NORW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer