PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIRL vs. EWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIRL vs. EWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIRL achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly lower than EWP's 6.62% return. Over the past 10 years, EIRL has underperformed EWP with an annualized return of 8.17%, while EWP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.11% annualized return.


EIRL

1D
0.20%
1M
4.00%
YTD
4.65%
6M
6.97%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
8.17%

EWP

1D
0.02%
1M
1.54%
YTD
6.62%
6M
12.03%
1Y
34.29%
3Y*
31.36%
5Y*
17.20%
10Y*
11.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIRL vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIRL
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
4.65%28.82%-1.64%35.13%-18.83%13.72%9.63%28.15%-21.92%29.82%
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
6.62%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.25%-3.94%11.93%-15.32%26.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EIRL and EWP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2010

0.65

The correlation between EIRL and EWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

EIRL vs. EWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIRL
EWP

Financial Services

34.0%
41.4%

Industrials

24.8%
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

14.6%

-

Healthcare

10.2%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
4.0%

Energy

4.8%
5.3%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.9%

Basic Materials

0.5%

-

Technology

0.3%
4.9%

Communication Services

-

2.9%

Utilities

-

21.2%

Financial Services

EIRL
34.0%
EWP
41.4%

Industrials

EIRL
24.8%
EWP
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

EIRL
14.6%
EWP

-

Healthcare

EIRL
10.2%
EWP
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EIRL
8.8%
EWP
4.0%

Energy

EIRL
4.8%
EWP
5.3%

Real Estate

EIRL
2.1%
EWP
2.9%

Basic Materials

EIRL
0.5%
EWP

-

Technology

EIRL
0.3%
EWP
4.9%

Communication Services

EIRL

-

EWP
2.9%

Utilities

EIRL

-

EWP
21.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIRL vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIRL
EIRL Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EIRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIRL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EIRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIRL Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIRL vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIRLEWPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.84

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

2.48

-0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

3.18

-1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.71

11.33

-6.62

EIRL vs. EWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIRL Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the EWP Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIRL and EWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIRLEWPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.84

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.85

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.50

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.31

+0.12

Drawdowns

EIRL vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIRL drawdown since its inception was -46.48%, smaller than the maximum EWP drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRL and EWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIRLEWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.48%

-61.19%

+14.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.28%

-11.38%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.04%

-12.19%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.14%

-33.91%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.48%

-46.36%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-1.56%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-21.44%

+12.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

3.19%

+1.16%

Volatility

EIRL vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) is 6.19%, while iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that EIRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIRLEWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

6.86%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.81%

15.60%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.02%

18.76%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.16%

20.24%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

22.23%

-0.47%

EIRL vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIRL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIRL vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison

EIRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than EWP's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIRL
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
2.59%2.71%2.56%1.00%1.13%0.82%0.50%2.11%1.52%1.44%1.34%1.70%
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.13%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIRL and EWP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWP has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to EIRL (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRL dropped -46.48% vs EWP's -61.19%.

On 10-year performance, EWP leads with 11.11% vs 8.17% for EIRL. On fees, EIRL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EIRL has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWP has performed better with a 11.11% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EIRL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWP.

EIRL has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 2.13% for EWP.

EIRL tracks MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index, while EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EIRL and 0.50% for EWP.

EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIRL and EWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer