EIRL vs. FLSW

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

EIRL (iShares MSCI Ireland ETF) and FLSW (Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EIRL tracks the MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index while FLSW tracks the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EIRL returned 8.27%/yr vs 7.32%/yr for FLSW. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EIRL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLSW.

Performance

EIRL vs. FLSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIRL achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than FLSW's 4.68% return.

EIRL

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 6.41%
• YTD: 6.54%
• 6M: 6.76%
• 1Y: 21.93%
• 3Y*: 12.83%
• 5Y*: 8.27%
• 10Y*: 9.04%

FLSW

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 4.68%
• 6M: 6.88%
• 1Y: 17.88%
• 3Y*: 12.33%
• 5Y*: 7.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIRL vs. FLSW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF	6.54%	28.82%	-1.64%	35.13%	-18.83%	13.72%	9.63%	28.15%	-19.77%
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF	4.68%	32.92%	-1.77%	16.79%	-18.14%	20.82%	13.25%	31.66%	-7.85%

Correlation

The correlation between EIRL and FLSW is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018	0.62

The correlation between EIRL and FLSW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

EIRL vs. FLSW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EIRL	FLSW
Financial Services	38.6%	17.6%
Consumer Defensive	19.0%	13.7%
Industrials	15.8%	14.1%
Healthcare	10.3%	37.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	5.7%
Energy	4.5%	-
Real Estate	2.3%	1.2%
Basic Materials	0.7%	7.8%
Technology	0.3%	1.3%
Communication Services	-	1.2%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

EIRL vs. FLSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIRL

EIRL Risk / Return Rank: 35
EIRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
EIRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
EIRL Omega Ratio Rank: 36
EIRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EIRL Martin Ratio Rank: 35

FLSW

FLSW Risk / Return Rank: 31
FLSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FLSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FLSW Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FLSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FLSW Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIRL vs. FLSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EIRL	FLSW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.14	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	1.72	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.20	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	1.34	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.07	4.28	+0.80

EIRL vs. FLSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIRL Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the FLSW Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIRL and FLSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EIRL vs. FLSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIRL drawdown since its inception was -46.48%, which is greater than FLSW's maximum drawdown of -28.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRL and FLSW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIRL	FLSW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.48%	-28.16%	-18.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.28%	-13.38%	-0.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.04%	-13.38%	-9.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.14%	-28.16%	-11.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-3.66%	+3.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.09%	-5.95%	-3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	4.19%	+0.14%

Volatility

EIRL vs. FLSW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) is 4.24%, while Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that EIRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIRL	FLSW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	4.76%	-0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.96%	12.51%	+2.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.15%	15.71%	+2.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.19%	15.77%	+5.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.73%	16.89%	+4.84%

EIRL vs. FLSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIRL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSW's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIRL vs. FLSW - Dividend Comparison

EIRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than FLSW's 2.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF	2.44%	2.71%	2.56%	1.00%	1.13%	0.82%	0.50%	2.11%	1.52%	1.44%	1.34%	1.70%
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF	2.02%	2.12%	2.04%	2.36%	2.02%	1.86%	2.28%	1.15%	2.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIRL and FLSW in my portfolio?

EIRL and FLSW have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EIRL or FLSW?

FLSW has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to EIRL (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRL dropped -46.48% vs FLSW's -28.16%.

Which ETF is better, EIRL or FLSW?

On 5-year performance, EIRL leads with 8.27% vs 7.32% for FLSW. On fees, FLSW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EIRL has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EIRL or FLSW?

Over the 5-year period, EIRL has performed better with a 8.27% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EIRL or FLSW?

FLSW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EIRL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EIRL or FLSW?

EIRL has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 2.02% for FLSW.

What is the main difference between EIRL and FLSW?

EIRL tracks MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index, while FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EIRL and 0.09% for FLSW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.