EIRL vs. EWA
EIRL (iShares MSCI Ireland ETF) and EWA (iShares MSCI-Australia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EIRL is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index, while EWA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIRL returned 9.18%/yr vs 8.75%/yr for EWA. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EIRL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWA.
Performance
EIRL vs. EWA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIRL achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly lower than EWA's 11.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EIRL having a 9.18% annualized return and EWA not far behind at 8.75%.
EIRL
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- 6.90%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 20.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
EWA
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 12.06%
- 1Y
- 14.64%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 5.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
EIRL vs. EWA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | 6.90% | 28.82% | -1.64% | 35.13% | -18.83% | 13.72% | 9.63% | 28.15% | -21.92% | 29.82% |
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF | 11.57% | 13.35% | 1.60% | 13.81% | -5.92% | 8.93% | 8.29% | 22.45% | -12.04% | 19.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIRL and EWA is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2010 | 0.58 |
The correlation between EIRL and EWA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
EIRL vs. EWA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EIRL
EWA
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EIRL
EWA
Industrials
EIRL
EWA
Consumer Defensive
EIRL
EWA
Healthcare
EIRL
EWA
Consumer Cyclical
EIRL
EWA
Energy
EIRL
EWA
Real Estate
EIRL
EWA
Basic Materials
EIRL
EWA
Technology
EIRL
EWA
Communication Services
EIRL
-
EWA
Utilities
EIRL
-
EWA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIRL vs. EWA — Risk / Return Rank
EIRL
EWA
EIRL vs. EWA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIRL | EWA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.14 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.33 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 3.68 | +0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIRL vs. EWA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIRL drawdown since its inception was -46.48%, smaller than the maximum EWA drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRL and EWA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIRL | EWA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.48% | -66.98% | +20.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.28% | -10.01% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.04% | -21.91% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.14% | -24.87% | -15.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.48% | -45.54% | -0.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.44% | +3.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.09% | -11.32% | +2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 3.62% | +0.73% |
Volatility
EIRL vs. EWA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) is 4.78%, while iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that EIRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIRL | EWA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 5.80% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.05% | 14.62% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.21% | 17.40% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 19.80% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 22.62% | -0.88% |
EIRL vs. EWA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIRL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIRL vs. EWA - Dividend Comparison
EIRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than EWA's 2.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | 2.53% | 2.71% | 2.56% | 1.00% | 1.13% | 0.82% | 0.50% | 2.11% | 1.52% | 1.44% | 1.34% | 1.70% |
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF | 2.88% | 3.21% | 3.71% | 3.72% | 5.28% | 5.08% | 2.02% | 3.97% | 6.11% | 4.44% | 4.03% | 5.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIRL and EWA have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWA has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to EIRL (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRL dropped -46.48% vs EWA's -66.98%.
On 10-year performance, EIRL leads with 9.18% vs 8.75% for EWA. On fees, EIRL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EIRL has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EIRL has performed better with a 9.18% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EIRL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWA.
EWA has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 2.53% for EIRL.
EIRL is categorized as Europe Equities, while EWA is Asia Pacific Equities. EIRL tracks MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index, while EWA tracks MSCI Australia Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EIRL and 0.50% for EWA.
EIRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIRL and EWA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer