PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIRAX vs. CRDBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIRAX vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIRAX achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than CRDBX's 18.79% return.


EIRAX

1D
0.24%
1M
3.47%
YTD
7.81%
6M
8.61%
1Y
18.33%
3Y*
10.23%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
6.18%

CRDBX

1D
0.24%
1M
6.93%
YTD
18.79%
6M
18.23%
1Y
42.68%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
15.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIRAX vs. CRDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EIRAX
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund
7.81%12.89%7.68%6.80%-14.73%7.22%9.15%
CRDBX
Potomac Defensive Bull Fund
18.79%25.36%19.91%18.44%-8.21%28.08%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EIRAX and CRDBX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020

0.50

The correlation between EIRAX and CRDBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (5 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIRAX vs. CRDBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIRAX
EIRAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
EIRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
EIRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDBX
CRDBX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CRDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIRAX vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIRAXCRDBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.14

3.13

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.05

4.40

-1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.73

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

6.21

-3.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.74

20.42

-9.68

EIRAX vs. CRDBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is lower than the CRDBX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIRAX and CRDBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIRAXCRDBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

3.13

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.84

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

1.10

-0.41

Drawdowns

EIRAX vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIRAX drawdown since its inception was -19.85%, smaller than the maximum CRDBX drawdown of -28.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRAX and CRDBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIRAXCRDBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.85%

-28.12%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.73%

-7.13%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.71%

-17.77%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.85%

-28.12%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-6.58%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.16%

-0.45%

Volatility

EIRAX vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX) is 2.74%, while Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that EIRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIRAXCRDBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

4.15%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

10.80%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.58%

14.16%

-5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.80%

19.73%

-10.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.10%

20.36%

-11.26%

EIRAX vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIRAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than CRDBX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIRAX vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison

EIRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than CRDBX's 12.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRDBX
Potomac Defensive Bull Fund
12.93%15.36%12.58%9.91%0.18%25.05%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EIRAX
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund
2.60%2.80%2.35%2.58%1.11%5.68%3.13%7.42%2.98%2.35%0.73%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIRAX and CRDBX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDBX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to EIRAX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRAX dropped -19.85% vs CRDBX's -28.12%.

CRDBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIRAX and CRDBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer