EIPX vs. MLPX
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX).
EIPX and MLPX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EIPX is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Nov 1, 2022. MLPX is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2013.
Performance
EIPX vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIPX vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF | 22.41% | 11.44% | 19.11% | 10.74% | 0.56% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.52% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | -2.05% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EIPX having a 22.41% return and MLPX slightly higher at 23.52%.
EIPX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 22.41%
- 6M
- 24.64%
- 1Y
- 27.37%
- 3Y*
- 21.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPX
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 23.52%
- 6M
- 20.89%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 29.25%
- 5Y*
- 24.62%
- 10Y*
- 14.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIPX vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIPX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIPX vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
EIPX
MLPX
EIPX vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIPX | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.69 | 1.15 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 1.51 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.44 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 4.48 | +3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIPX | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 1.15 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.36 | +0.91 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIPX and MLPX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EIPX vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than MLPX's 4.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF | 2.67% | 3.23% | 3.27% | 3.48% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.06% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
Drawdowns
EIPX vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIPX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPX and MLPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIPX | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.43% | -70.67% | +55.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.87% | -14.92% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -2.01% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -16.81% | +14.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 4.81% | -1.42% |
Volatility
EIPX vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is 2.90%, while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that EIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIPX | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 3.63% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.10% | 10.35% | -2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.29% | 18.88% | -2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 20.00% | -4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 26.59% | -11.40% |