PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIPX vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIPX vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPX achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than GRID's 17.75% return.


EIPX

1D
0.49%
1M
3.77%
6M
14.96%
YTD
24.74%
1Y
29.89%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.15%

GRID

1D
1.53%
1M
-2.62%
6M
9.29%
YTD
17.75%
1Y
28.13%
3Y*
20.65%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*
18.38%
ALL TIME*
12.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.76M$1.94M$1.35M
$98.53M$102.24M$137.97M

EIPX vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EIPX
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
24.74%11.44%19.11%10.74%1.77%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
17.75%29.65%15.18%21.57%7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPX and GRID is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between EIPX and GRID has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EIPX vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIPX
GRID

Energy

68.3%
1.6%

Utilities

27.0%
3.9%

Industrials

4.5%
23.6%

Technology

0.3%
12.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Energy

EIPX
68.3%
GRID
1.6%

Utilities

EIPX
27.0%
GRID
3.9%

Industrials

EIPX
4.5%
GRID
23.6%

Technology

EIPX
0.3%
GRID
12.6%

Basic Materials

EIPX

-

GRID
0.8%

Communication Services

EIPX

-

GRID

-

Consumer Cyclical

EIPX

-

GRID
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

EIPX

-

GRID

-

Financial Services

EIPX

-

GRID

-

Healthcare

EIPX

-

GRID

-

Real Estate

EIPX

-

GRID

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIPX vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EIPX
EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EIPX vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIPXGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.22

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

1.73

+3.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.59

6.17

+9.42

EIPX vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPX and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIPX vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPX and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIPXGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.43%

-40.56%

+25.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.17%

-15.82%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.43%

-20.62%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-9.87%

+8.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-8.42%

+6.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

4.42%

-2.57%

Volatility

EIPX vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is 3.45%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that EIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIPXGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

8.92%

-5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.73%

20.34%

-11.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44%

23.07%

-11.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.95%

21.71%

-6.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.95%

22.81%

-7.86%

EIPX vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIPX vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than GRID's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIPX
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
2.69%3.23%3.27%3.48%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIPX and GRID have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to EIPX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPX dropped -15.43% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 3-year performance, GRID leads with 20.65% vs 19.41% for EIPX. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, EIPX has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GRID has performed better with a 20.65% return vs 19.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.

EIPX is categorized as Energy Equities, while GRID is Infrastructure Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EIPX and 0.70% for GRID.

EIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIPX and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer