PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIPI vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EIPI vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EIPI vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPI achieves a 14.09% return, which is significantly higher than QCLN's 5.17% return.


EIPI

1D
-0.93%
1M
0.29%
YTD
14.09%
6M
16.15%
1Y
17.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCLN

1D
0.90%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
5.17%
6M
8.63%
1Y
61.08%
3Y*
-2.97%
5Y*
-7.09%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EIPI vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPI has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EIPI vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPI
EIPI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPI vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIPIQCLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

1.63

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

2.23

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

3.97

-2.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.50

12.27

-5.77

EIPI vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPI and QCLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIPIQCLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.63

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

0.15

+1.48

Correlation

The correlation between EIPI and QCLN is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EIPI vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

EIPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than QCLN's 0.21% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIPI
FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF
6.73%9.71%6.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.21%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%

Drawdowns

EIPI vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPI drawdown since its inception was -12.33%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPI and QCLN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EIPIQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.33%

-76.18%

+63.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-16.18%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-45.67%

+44.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-43.54%

+41.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

5.24%

-2.42%

Volatility

EIPI vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) is 2.76%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that EIPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EIPIQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

13.73%

-10.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.94%

27.33%

-20.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

37.76%

-23.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.24%

37.87%

-24.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.24%

34.62%

-21.38%